Dear Jones, In your opinion, what exactly are Rossi's problems? Perhaps you could use the 5 criteria of an energy source: - intensity, - reproducibility and controllability; - continuity, - safety; - scale-up
Add to these his intellectual property problems- not only patenting here. How do you think about these? Thanks! Peter On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > *From:* Stephen A. Lawrence > > > > Ø Jones, who put such an angry bee in your bonnet over Rossi? > > > > There is no anger – just disappointment that so many are jumping to > hyperbolic conclusions which are not justified by the record. And > disappointment that technology so potentially valuable [to society] goes > misunderstood by those chosen by Rossi, and that it could succumb to greed > [OPEC for instance] if it is not fully understood, before long. > > > > How many times do I have to say it - the NiH reaction is gainful ! > > > > The is no doubt it is gainful – I have seen this recently first hand but > that does not mean that it is even close to what Rothwell wants to believe > it is. In my opinion Rossi does not have a clue and sadly, neither does > Focardi. Aren’t we all entitled to express that? > > > > You swallowed all the nonsense spewed out by *Doctor* Stiffler, quite > some time back > > > > Not really. I reported Stiffler’s results as they were presented – and he > was not hiding anything in a “black box,” to his credit. I also reported the > problems when they were found, which is where Jed has a blind eye – with > Rossi. > > > Jed's being a whole lot more reasonable about this than you were about > the Stiffler "miracle", as far as I can see. > > > > You really believe that 130,000 watt in 15 minutes to a reactor will not > raise copious steam ? That ‘miracle’ puts Stiffler’s few watts from ground > to shame. > > > > The point of this being that many creative inventors (artists writers poets > etc) are often cranky and weird. That should not be news to anyone. If they > are not honest, that adds to the problem when the technology can essentially > serve to “save our way of life” and when this happens, and when Rossi has > hidden the facts about the $2 million+ he has received from DoE since 2000 > to get to where he is now, he should be exposed for that. US taxpayers OWN a > stake in this and it will shortly come out as FIA papers have been filed. > > > > BTW – Stiffler was NOT hiding the ground looping problem, and continues to > try to push it to the limits. I have not talked to him in years but he posts > his results to YouTube. Recently it appears he has been able to get a > surprising amount of voltage and LED light emission from only a ground > connection: > > > > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXYY7TqS380 > > > > Can you do anything close to that? If nothing else, the electricity grid > suppliers of the world should take note of whatever is going on here. > Needless to say they will be taking note of Rossi even if the COP in Sweden > turns out to be 10 (my guess) instead of Rothwell’s 1000+. > > > > Jones > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
