See the message "NiO is the answer"

On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 5:17 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote:

>  Axil,
>
>
>
> Ø
>
> Ø  Loading hydrogen into Rust does not produce nuclear derived heat.
>
>
>
> Correct – it produce iron and water. I do not see Fe2O3 specifically as
> being involved at all in Rossi.
>
>
>
> FeO – however, when fully supported (shared oxygen) does make sense - but
> not Fe2O3. After all, the Swedes said iron in some form was there at a fair
> percentage, and they did sophisticated testing.
>
>
>
> Hydrogen reduction is one way that low carbon iron is processed from iron
> ore by the way. Iron ore is essentially rust. How to you propose to
> attenuate the reduction of rust inside the Rossi cell ? It could not last an
> hour.
>
>
>
> Having said that – your speculation about nickel oxide and copper oxide as
> Mott insulators does have merit, BUT ONLY when they are positioned to share
> their oxygen atom with the zirconia support. Otherwise they would be rapidly
> reduced also. In the same way, FeO is possible to be used as a catalyst - if
> and when supported on a dielectric, plus FeO is probably a Mott insulator. I
> don’t think rust qualifies at all, since it is fairly conductive.
>
>
>
> BTW – iron oxides of various levels have been used in tonnage as a bulk
> catalysts with hydrogen for a long time – that much is true. When used in
> the Haber process, the oxides are partially reduced ahead of time, and there
> is a competing oxidant present (nitrogen) which lowers the rate of full
> reduction to iron, but even so - catalyst must be replaced periodically and
> often, which is inconsistent with running a Rossi reactor continuously. Rust
> or magnetite was ideal in the original Haber process since it is more
> valuable when reduced, than as a refined ore.
>
>
>
> If there was to be any heat anomaly involving rust - we would have known
> about it long ago, as the ammonia industry is old, competitive and was a
> national priority 100 years ago. Every detail of Haber and its offshoots has
> been thoroughly analyzed.
>
>
>
> Jones
>
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to