Where is the derivation of phi in terms of a circle published? There are no references or names in that article.
Thanks Joe -- Dr Joe Karthauser On 14 Mar 2011, at 18:19, Shek Singhal <[email protected]> wrote: > Just curious if anyone else here has looked at alternate derivations of Pi > based upon Phi - given that there really should only be one universal > curvature constant for space-time? > > I thought I would present this here before I write-up my full formal > illustrated proof and find an audience for it: > http://vortexspace.org/display/~integral54/Closed-Form-Derivation+of+Pi+from+Phi > > Basically I claim that the starting digits of Pi are 3.1446(...) > http://goldennumber.net/phiformulageometry.htm > > I have received reports that certain people at NASA already know this and are > already using this new (corrected) value of Pi. > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 Alan J Fletcher wrote: > At 07:10 AM 3/14/2011, Terry Blanton wrote: > 3.14 > Thought we needed a smile. > > This afternoon you have a second chance for: > > 3/14 1:59:26 > > =8=) >
