Joshua Cude wrote:
If the effect were real, it would not stall at the marginal level.
Many cold fusion results are marginal, but others are not. Even in 1989 there were many dramatic heat events and some tritium production at extraordinarily high signal to noise ratios. There were solid reports of heat after death producing palpable heat 5 orders of magnitude higher than any chemical source can account for. To call this "marginal" is such blatant, outrageous nonsense . . . I don't know what to make of it. It is hard to respond.
You do know that "marginal" means close to the margin of error, don't you? Did you have some other meaning in mind?! "Politically marginalized," perhaps?
You seem to know something about this research. Surely you have read McKubre, Fleischmann and Storms and seen the graphs. Yet you persist in calling these results "marginal." You are either technically illiterate, or you are a liar. Anyone who glances at the graph on the front page at http://lenr-canr.org <http://lenr-canr.org/index.html> will see you are wrong.
Let me remind you that repeating a lie does not make it the truth. Also, most members of this audience are familiar with the cold fusion literature, and they know your assertions are wrong. You are not fooling anyone.
- Jed
