At 10:18 AM 2/22/2011, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:

On 02/21/2011 03:01 PM, Joshua Cude wrote:

Promises have been made by Pons & Fleischmann first in 1989 (just watch their interviews on youtube, where they claim it is the ideal energy source: clean and unlimited and simple) and then by just about every cold fusion advocate since, including McKubre on 60 minutes promising cars that don't need refueling, Rothwell's entire book of promises, and promises from shady characters like Dardik and Rossi. There are endless promises every time the topic arises. [...] Cold fusion [...] has not delivered.

That's true in a field I've spent some time working in, too. People promise all sorts of things, and then the things show up years late, or more often never show up "as promised", at all. In fact, I've made promises which later turned out to be impossible to deliver on, weren't even possible in theory, as we figured out much later.

So, I guess the stuff I work with is all bunk, all just phony-baloney, it's lies and coverups, it can't be real, because we don't succeed in delivering on our promises. It's really too bad, if the sort of stuff I worked on were real, it would make a big difference to the world. But we miss on our promises, so it's all hokum; that's totally conclusive, air-tight reasoning, Joshua sure hit the nail on the head there.

Too bad.

I'm a programmer, by the way.

Well, that explains it. Programs don't exist, the relationship between input and output is random, and attempts to show correlation have completely failed. If information technology were real, it would be reliable, and we would always get the same output.

People are fools to believe that a hunk of sand could handle information and make decisions based on it, it's a fantasy, a product of wishful thinking, fed by 1960s science fiction. When I was young, people were still sensible enough to know that this would be impossible, but the aggressive sales forces of Intel and Fairchild and so forth overcame our common sense, and now we spend huge amounts of time and money on complete fantasy, such as these conversations, which clearly do not exist.

Reply via email to