On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 4:35 PM, Horace Heffner <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip> > Independent evaluation of the commercial viability and utility of an > invention like this is typically made, and could have been made in this > case, by an independent third party, under a nondisclosure agreement (NDA) > before commercial financing is provided. Evaluation of excess heat by > calorimetry can even be accomplished free onsite by using companies like > Earthtech (www.earthtech.org). But Murray cross posted derogatory comments on the experiment here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg42393.html And the archives do not show all the recipients unlike my gmail archives: "from Rich Murray <[email protected]> reply-to [email protected] to [email protected], michael barron <[email protected]>, Rich Murray <[email protected]>, Rich Murray <[email protected]>, "Sterling D. Allen" <[email protected]>, [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] date Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 12:15 PM subject [Vo]:Levi's interpretation of the two Rossi demos does not hold water, decisive critique by Joshua Cude: Rich Murray 2011.02.08 mailed-by eskimo.com unsubscribe Unsubscribe from this sender hide details Feb 8 (9 days ago) Levi's interpretation of the two Rossi demos does not hold water, decisive critique by Joshua Cude: Rich Murray 2011.02.08" <snip> Which included members of Earthtech. When I suggested he include Earthtech in his retraction: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg42488.html Rich did not respond, leaving Earthtech with a "bad taste in their mouth". Unethical, IMO. T
