-----Original Message-----
From: Terry Blanton
The implication to me is that LockMart (or others) might have already signed
up for military applications, like they did with EEStor.
BTW - the mention of EEStor, and their unfortunate 'change of focus' brings
up two points.
1) As mentioned before, the most probable reason that Barium titanate will
never be permitted in a consumer application is related to the 'exploding
capacitor' phenomenon and the extraordinarily high shock-wave which is
expected from overcharging dielectric material in the kV range. Catch-22 the
material has no real advantage unless it is charged to these levels.
However,
1a) This device might make an excellent explosive device.
1b) Even more so if Barium is active for some kind of triggered LENR
2) In Gilson's paper on quantum coupling where he looks at the significance
of 'alpha' when reduced to geometry - a spherical polygon of 137 units -
Barium is the only element with a stable isotope of 137 nucleons.
3) No element with z = 137 is known but would possibly be called feynmanium
(symbol Fy) if found, because Richard Feynman noted that the relativistic
Dirac equation runs into problems at Z > 1/α = 137, and breaks down at this
point. The Bohr model too exhibits the same problem since any element Z >
137 would require 1s electrons to be traveling faster than c.
Conclusion: Of course this is almost ridiculous to speculate about, given
the unknowns, but the shockwave from overcharging this kind of capacitor in
a short time frame could conceivably trigger Barium into a previously
unknown kind of nuclear reaction, based on quantum susceptibility - but at
any rate, we will need to look elsewhere for such an advanced 'bettery'.
However, today in the SciNews, an even better bettery concept has been
announced involving nano copper.
