In Rossi's most recent post he says, " ... the inventor, in this case me, has to disclose to the Public all the clues of the technology. Of course, such clues remain confidential until the Patent is granted." This may indicate that he's only holding back until they have resolved all other issues with the patent examiner, and then he would amend the patent one final time to include the catalyst(s)??? He and his investors must consider the possibility that if he doesn't patent the catalyst, then his patents are pretty useless; and if someone else figures out what the catalyst is, then they lose their legal ability to amend their patent and add the catalyst. The stakes are very high...
-Mark _____ From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2011 9:41 AM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [Vo]:The Wicked Problem Yes - definitely Focardi. They have been in touch previously by telephone, so there was no mistake in identity. There is NO hedging on this point. This catalyst is a trade secret. As to the identity of the catalyst being known only to Rossi, that may not be literally true, since this work was first performed in conjunction with Leonardo Technologies in New Hampshire USA, and there was a small staff involved. Jones From: Peter Gluck Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Wicked Problem Dear Jed, Let's see first if was Focardi. So much is lost in translations!
