Dear Jones, I don't understand what you say exactly. What I know for sure is that Piantelli has a perfect reproducible Ni-H process and this one developed by Piantelli's former collaborator and an inventor is very similar to that. Why do you believe that I am speaking about Ni-H technology in general, that by the way is an abstraction?
The device works, don't know how it works- no problem but nobody, including its developers don't know either, reaction X responsible for a% of the released heat and so on...Heat cannot be correlated with known nuclear reaction, no theory. Therefore- thank you for mentioning my friend Randy my guess is that hydrinos are at the play and I intend to ask him how can this be proven- or on the contrary. Randy's CIHT technology will be demonstated this year, most probably late summer. I am a chemical engineer have worked mainly for process developments- so I am able to appreciate the difficulties. Jones vs Leonardo- ia nie znaiu- have no idea. Peter On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:23 PM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > *From:* Peter Gluck > > > > Ø Suppose Rossi is the Al Capone of science and the Ostap Bender of > technology, how many non working damned generators will he sell? I think his > past, character, are not relevant. > > > > You miss the point almost completely, Peter. This is not about the nickel > hydride technology in general, which is solid – going back twenty years. No > one doubts that this level of gain can be accomplished, in principle. But > has it been accomplished in fact? > > > > Do not forget Randell Mills’ (Blacklight Power) prior art position, either. > Except for the slight radioactivity seen by Rossi, Mills is arguable better > positioned in this niche. Mills’ experiments are rock-solid in my book, > unlike what has been shown today. Mills also claims a much larger COP. > > > > Yes, Rossi’s past history is only relevant if it is part of his present. We > agree on that. > > > > In bringing up the fiasco in New Hampshire, I am indicating that he appears > to be afoul of the Law there, and that was very recent - so we cannot be > certain that this latest episode is not more of the same. That remains to be > determined. Notice specifically that he NEVER mentions Leonardo > Technologies, which owns the rights to this new work. > > > > The specific question for us now is this: does Rossi have a **bona fide > advancement** in the nickel hydride niche, or not? > > > > I strongly suggest that nothing … absolutely NOTHING … seen so far, proves > that he does have it. I think he does, but that is only based on things not > in the record. Certainly his (already rejected) patent application proves > nothing. Yes, there are indications that he has found the “secret > ingredient”, but this depends on his credibility. > > > > If so inclined, almost any good con-artist could fake a better presentation > than what has been shown. Is Rossi still that kind of con artist? He was > four years ago in the DARPA fiasco. > > > > Maybe he has reformed now, who knows? … all that we do know at present, > until he addresses the charges of prior conduct, including the Leonardo > contract - is that he “once” was in that category. > > > > Jones > > > > >
