Thanks! Can you send me a link for the full text of the patent? I'm online at home at 1:15 AM MST in Santa Fe, New Mexico, waiting for their online demo in 45 minutes -- looks like the real thing, for sure... Rich [email protected]
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 12:10 AM, Peter Gluck <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear Rich. > Have you seen the brand new patent -published just in time (January 13) > WO 20110005506 "Method and apparstus for carrying out nickel and hydrogen > exotermal reaction" inventor Andrea Rossi? > Peter > > On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:15 AM, Rich Murray <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> A new energy source from nuclear fusion, S Focardi, A Rossi, 9p text >> 2010.03.22: Rich Murray 2011.01.14 >> >> http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdf >> 9 pages >> >> A new energy source from nuclear fusion >> S. Focardi (1) >> and A. Rossi (2) >> (1) Physics Department Bologna University and INFN Bologna Section >> (2) Leonardo Corp. (USA) - Inventor of the Patent >> March 22, 2010 >> >> Abstract >> >> A process (international patent publication N. WO 2009/125444 A1) >> capable of producing large amounts of energy by a nuclear fusion process >> between nickel and hydrogen, occurring below 1000 K, is described. >> Experimental values of the ratios between output and input energies >> obtained in a certain number of experiments are reported. >> The occurrence of the effect is justified on the basis of existing >> experimental and theoretical results. >> Measurements performed during the experiments allow to exclude >> neutron and gamma rays emissions. >> >> The patented apparatus is able of producing a constant and reliable >> amount of energy for a period of months. >> >> Two different samples of material used in the experiments labelled in >> table >> 1 as method A (288 kWh produced) and method B (4774 kWh produced) >> were analysed at Padua University SIMS. >> In the long period sample, the mass analysis showed the presence of >> three peaks in the mass region 63-65 a.m.u. >> which correspond respectively to Cu 63, elements (Ni 64 and Zn 64) >> deriving from Cu 64 decay and Cu 65. >> These allowed us the determination of the ratio Cu 63/Cu 65=1,6 >> different from the value (2,24) relative to the copper isotopic natural >> composition. >> The peak in the mass spectrum at a.m.u.=64, due to Ni 64 >> and Zn 64 (both caming from Cu 64 decay) >> requires the existence of Ni 63 which, >> absent in natural Ni composition, must have been in precedence >> produced starting by more light nickel isotopes. >> More details on this analysis will be given in a successive paper [8]. >> >> 6. email address >> [email protected] >> [email protected] >> > >
