I am not bothered by the blog format of the journal. The other "red flags" might have some merit.
Harry ----- Original Message ---- > From: Rich Murray <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: Rich Murray <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Sent: Fri, January 14, 2011 4:53:27 PM > Subject: [Vo]:Focardi And Rossi Energy Amplifier: Reality or Scam? 2011.01.14 > >Steven B. Krivit: Rich Murray 2011.01.14 > > Focardi And Rossi Energy Amplifier: Reality or Scam? 2011.01.14 Steven > B. Krivit: Rich Murray 2011.01.14 > > http://blog.newenergytimes.com/2011/01/14/focardi-and-rossi-reality-or-scam/ > > Focardi And Rossi Energy Amplifier: Reality or Scam? > Posted on January 14, 2011 by Steven B. Krivit > By Steven B. Krivit > > Journal of Nuclear Physics? Really? > > - A web site registered in California by a secret entity. > - A “journal” that is not a journal but a blog. > - A blog name that resembles the (real) former Soviet Journal of > Nuclear Physics. > - A virtual “editor” comprised of a “team of scientists.” > - A “team of scientists” who’s only active participant appears to be > Andrea Rossi. > - A “10 kW module reactor” that is anybody’s guess. > > Record of e-mail exchange, Jan. 12, 2011: > ***** > > Dear Editor, > Who is the editor of JONP? > Thank you, > Steven B. Krivit > Editor, New Energy Times > ***** > > The editor of JONP is a team of scientists who finance the Journal. > We have no owner and we are a free association. We publish for free > all the papers that our Board Of Advisers deems scientifically valid > and we do not accept advertising to remain completely independent. > Warm regards, > JONP, The Board Of Advisers > ***** > > To whom am I speaking please? > Rossi? > Focardi? > ***** > > I am writing on behalf of the board of advisers, > Andrea Rossi > >
