If gravity is not more than a conventional form of electromagnetism, why
o simple gravity shielding is possible?
It is not. Gravity and electromagnetism are different force fields.
- Gravity is the result of the interation of Earth's magnetic and electric
fields. The net force we call gravity is no more than one of the
consequences of the interaction of these fields. Other of the consequences
is Earth's rotation.
I far is I know gravity is produced by mass (per Newton). A step more will
show that the force that confines energy in matter
generates the gravitaitonal field (per Einstein's general theory of relativity).
-----Original Message-----
From: Mauro Lacy <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, Jul 26, 2010 1:27 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Latest Gravity Research with AlienScientist
Hi Frank,
Although this is different from your work, I think it is interesting in
tself, and I thank you for posting it.
Indeed, if you vortexians want we can even discuss it.
he main points of the presentation(which has a strictly engineering
pproach), is:
Gravity is the result of the interation of Earth's magnetic and electric
ields. The net force we call gravity is no more than one of the
onsequences of the interaction of these fields. Other of the consequences
s Earth's rotation.
As the approach is a scrictly an engineering one, no mention is made on
he causes of these fields, and the form of the fields themselves is
erived to comply with the observed form of the Van Allen belts, the
agnetoshpere, and the acceleration of gravity on Earth's surface, among
ther conditions.
Some questions I would like to ask the author are:
If gravity is not more than a conventional form of electromagnetism, why
o simple gravity shielding is possible?
We know the form of Earth's magnetic field, (and this is considered in
he second part). A corresponding electric field is derived to comply with
he observed form of Van Allen belts, etc. caused by the interaction with
he magnetic field. The question is: can't this oscillating electric field
ctually be observed/measured? maybe in Earth's upper ionosphere?
Regarding the "loose end", which is the constant of proportionality
etween the force and the acceleration, which is in Kg/m^2, that is a unit
f pressure, not density. Then, it can be related to the radiation
ressure per unit area, which can be a consequence of the Earth's
nvironment (i.e. solar radiation, mostly) per Earth's "effective area",
hich can in turn be a measure of a number of factors like Earth's size,
orm, and composition.
If this is the case, gravity must change accordingly to changes in solar
adiation. As seems to be the case with eclipses (i.e. so called gravity
hielding.)
Mauro
I don't know what this is either. I say something different. You will
find my story
The Duality of Matter and Waves in the up and comming addition of Infinte
Energy.
Frank Znidarsic
Thanks, interesting.
I started reading and I wonder what
EM accelerating force (gravity)
frequencies of 7.07Hz, 14.14Hz, 21.21Hz and 28.28Hz
means in document GravityPrst22.ppt page 16
I don't think I will read more before I have the answer to this question.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mauro Lacy <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sat, Jul 24, 2010 3:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Latest Gravity Research with AlienScientist
On 07/24/2010 01:39 PM, David Jonsson wrote:
Thanks, interesting.
I started reading and I wonder what
EM accelerating force (gravity)
frequencies of 7.07Hz, 14.14Hz, 21.21Hz and 28.28Hz
means in document GravityPrst22.ppt page 16
I don't think I will read more before I have the answer to this question.
I think you should read the other pdf (part one) first. They are listed in
inverse order.
All this is very interesting, and coincide with my intuitions regarding
these issues.
Probably the values of these frequencies (or of its associated longitudes
) can be deducted in turn from the geometry of the solar system. That is,
Earth's geometry is not the cause of these frequencies, but conversely,
these frequencies are the cause of the Earth's geometry, to a certain
extent. The other extent being dictated by opportunity, and of course,
evolution.
Best regards,
Mauro
