-----Original Message----- From: Jed Rothwell I'm not sure about "discredit" but I think we can all agree that despite his last name, Scott Little does cast a large shadow. Plus, he takes up a large fraction of the space in an elevator.
Chris Tinsley remarked that it is standing joke in England to name large people "Little," going back to the days of Robin Hood and Little John. What do they call fools? Shanahan? Aukshully, in Gaelic, methinks it is Amadan I am pretty sure that "discredit" is "apropos of nothing, really" ... Scott would probably love to see real proof of a robust energy anomaly as much as any of us. However, he does not suffer from the "expectation effect" nor "inventor's disease" and he does not cut corners. The fact that his standards of reproducible proof are high only increases the credibility of his positive report, once someone finally does take that bullet-proof experiment to Austin. My prediction is that it will happen before the end of summer 2010. A quick look at their website shows nothing new in the last year, so they can probably squeeze you in next week, if you have it ready. And "you" probably think this post refers to you. Jones
