On Apr 4, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
If Takahashi's math is confirmed, we have a real candidate for an explanation, though not necessarily the whole story.
It is not Takahashi's math that is in question, but his assumptions and the implications of his conclusions.
Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/
