Stephen A. Lawrence [mailto:[email protected]] wrote:
>The only interaction between a live electrical circuit and a physical
>object on which it can do work is in step (3).  In that step, the coil
>is energized in such a way that it would REPEL the magnet, which is
>moving away from it.  Think about it -- the core attracts the other
>magnet, and the coil is canceling that attraction, so the coil is
>repelling the other magnet.  In essence, the coil is pushing the magnet
>away, working against the attractive force of the coil.
>
>So, the phase where work is being done by the battery is the phase when
>the coil is energized and the magnet and coil are moving apart.
>
>To see where and how much energy is being pumped into the system to do
>useful work, look at the induced voltage in the coil during that phase.
>
>Say it again, louder:  Linear superposition!  Sure, the 
>magnetization of
>the core changes, but to a very large extent, when you "cancel" the
>field of the core, you're looking at the coil and core fields adding
>linearly.  The field of the coil is still there, still interacting with
>the environment, but it's hidden by the superposed field of the core.

Because the interacting fields are essentially perpendicular and
the toroid is saturating, looking at this from the perspective of
linear superposition is not productive. The motor needs to be
considered from the point of view of a parametric interaction.
There will be essentially no CEMF because of the perpendicular fields.
A higher current will be required to saturate the core when the
magnet is present, which suggests that more energy may be required.
The interaction and energy input is quite difficult to calculate due to the
inductance variation and the combined fields. There is no new physics
in this motor. This does not prove that the design cannot be overunity.

I have tested many magnetic parametric transformers including soft
materials and magnets in many geometries. I started out with efficiencies
around 30% but with carefully selected geometries, materials, frequencies
and
path reluctances obtained efficiencies of over 95 % energy transfer but
so far no overunity. Motors with moving magnets in a parametric mode
is something that I have considered but not built.

George Holz 
Varitronics Systems




Reply via email to