Reading the comments section of the physorg.org article (http://www.physorg.com/news157046734.html) posted by Jones Beene at the start of the thread "Tracking the colorful Quark" I stumbled on this: http://www.chemicalforums.com/index.php?topic=17140.0 in a post from user WGUGLINSKI, Wladimir Guglinski.
Googling for "Quantum Ring Theory": http://peswiki.com/index.php/PowerPedia:Quantum_Ring_Theory http://peswiki.com/index.php/Quantum_Ring_Theory_corroborated_by_radiative_decay_mode_of_the_neutron http://peswiki.com/index.php/Repulsive_gravity_within_the_hydrogen_atom Despite the author's shameless self promotion on the chemicalforums.com site, despite he's selling a book with the explanation of his Quantum Ring Theory, and despite his bad attitude (and english), I'm curious about what Vortexians may think about his ideas. I've searched the archives and his theory was mentioned once in 2006 and again in 2008, here: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg16107.html http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg24006.html It strikes me that I've independently arrived to a number of similar ideas: 1) Repulsive gravity at the atomic scale. 2) Zitterbewegung. He talks about an helical trajectory of the electron in the atom, and a possible model of Zitterbewegung being this trajectory, or trajectory signature, if I'm not mistaken. He does not talk about gravity as a pulsation, but a helical trajectory can be decomposed into a rotation and an axial displacement. If this axial displacement is repetitive, and changes direction, it's a pulsation. He says this helical model for Zitterbewegung is Schrödinger's invention. He has a model for the neutron, formed by a proton plus an electron. I'm not knowledgeable enough, but this has resonances to hydrinos as fractional atoms to me (are hydrinos equivalent to Guglinski neutrons?) He derives what he calls the "neutron anomalous mass" as composed by the sum of a proton mass plus the electron mass relativistically increased to the equivalent of a velocity of 0.92c. Some problems with disappearing spins and "transformed electrons" in the Guglinski neutron, but he says his neutron model explains why there aren't neutron-neutron only nuclides, something that (he says) QM cannot. He also claims to explain why there's usually no electron-proton interaction during neutron decay. He says that some experiments confirm his neutron model, in particular: 1- C. Borghi, C. Giori, A.A. Dall’Ollio, "Experimental Evidence of Emission of Neutrons from Cold Hydrogen Plasma," American Institute of Physics (Phys. At. Nucl.), vol 56, no 7, 1993. 2- E. Conte, M. Pieralice, "An Experiment Indicates the Nuclear Fusion of the Proton and Electron into a Neutron," Infinite Energy, vol 4, no 23-1999, p 67. 3- R.P. Taleyarkhan, C.D. West, J.S. Cho, R.T. Lahey, Jr., R.I. Nigmatulin, and R.C. Block, "Evidence for Nuclear Emissions During Acoustic Cavitation," Science, vol 295, pp 1868-1873 (March 8, 2002) (in Research Articles). Guglinski also claims to explain Cold Fusion as a consequence of his neutron model, but I couldn't find the explanation. The book is not in electronic form. Comments? Regards, Mauro
