Krebbs cycle:  H2O2 hydrogen-peroxide is present within the metabolic 
intracellular energyproducing/respiration 'Krebbs Cycle' constantly.  Likely as 
not a hydrolytic spin-off relative to this ubiquitous cellular function creates 
H2 & O2 intracellularly in sufficient amounts. And in the present of a high 
outside-the-body ambient EM charge in our modern  & routine high exposure to 
direct-EM &/or
static-charge fields such as spending long hours closely in front of TV 
phosphorescence.  The TV cathode-ray direct field is actually quite formidable. 
 And our body's  are obviously water-based sacks of constantly active 
electro-chemical/electro-valent activity; hydrolysis causing large H2 & O2 
presence saturation of the intracellular corpus-matrix could possibly be 
sparked the something prozaic like a simple static spark &/or cigarette 
ignition of pulmonary respiration having a H2/O2 exhaust straight from the 
lungs.   Or maybe even a simple static shock to any part of the body might 
initiate a massive whole body fire/reaction in this enviroment.  Where there is 
water/H2O chemical interactive & hydrolytic  systems this potential is actually 
so high that it is a wonder that we do not see it more often.  And maybe we do 
but it stays confined to small internal areas but deals a lethal affect that is 
routinely written off as the 'effects of aging' etc. especially of course in 
the elderly-shut-ins in front of TV-sets all day whom the effect seems to 
predominate among.

Thusly 'dragon's breath' might not be such a myth as we haved surmised.-JO-

 

 

> Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 13:16:44 -0400
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Spontaneous Human Combustion (SHC)
> To: [email protected]
> 
> I may want to retract my ref to Heffners' and Haischs' theory below - I 
> believe their version may only require the cavity translation and is 
> independent of bonding.
> Fran
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roarty, Francis X [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 1:05 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Spontaneous Human Combustion (SHC)
> 
> 
> [Snip] point 3 
> 3) A pre-exisiting genetic factor that is little known - and would be
> involved with the LENR or hot hydrogen process itself, "after" combustion
> initiation by mundane effects, and which could be a factor similar to what
> is seen in this video, of a family that has unusual magnetic bio-fields:
> [end snip]
> 
> Jones,
> I agree with your points 1 and 2 but disagree with your timing mentioned in 
> point 3 ' "after" combustion initiation by mundane effects" '
> You know I endorse relativistic hydrogen vs the hydrino to avoid sub ground 
> state and explain the non radiative nature of the hydrino but regardless of 
> which view you take there is no need for combustion to create heat. Bonds are 
> restored to monatomic energy levels by the nature of the Casimir cavity in 
> all of these theories (Mills, Haisch, Heffner and my own). I would interpret 
> the SHC as the mundane combustion following the loading and acceleration of 
> monatomic ambient gases in the porous cavities of human bone. I think the SHC 
> is similar to the Japanese results with hydrogen gas diffused and allowed to 
> soak in Pd nano materials.
> Best Regards
> Fran
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jones Beene [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2009 12:08 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:Spontaneous Human Combustion (SHC)
> 
> ----Original Message-----
> From: Horace Heffner 
> 
> I think spontaneous human combustion (SHC) is worthy of consideration 
> in relation to cold fusion because (a) there is solid evidence it 
> exists and (b) it may provide clues as to how to achieve a robust 
> free or nuclear energy process in a chemical environment. This has 
> been discussed in this forum in past years. A summary of my comments 
> here is provided at:
> 
> http://mtaonline.net/~hheffner/SHC.pdf
> 
> 
> Yes, we have tossed around some wild ideas in the past.
> 
> This piece is a good and relatively non-controversial statement of a
> controversial situation - since it might portend or suggest the LENR factor.
> If the range of possible explanations and contributing factors were to be
> made more complete - then it could also mention several other details:
> 
> 1) Bifurcation from the mundane "initiator" - The interconnection (in many
> of the cases) with cigarettes, alcohol, obesity and season (usually winter).
> These would only explain the initiation of the phenomenon, and the
> "starved-flame" scenario which "should" then be self-quenching, or else
> consume the entire residence. Since that does not happen, we must move on to
> step two, which could then relate to LENR, or to ....
> 
> 2) The hydrino, "hot hydrogen" (Langmuir) or alternative fractional-hydrogen
> explanation. Either or which can very likely depend on:
> 
> 3) A pre-exisiting genetic factor that is little known - and would be
> involved with the LENR or hot hydrogen process itself, "after" combustion
> initiation by mundane effects, and which could be a factor similar to what
> is seen in this video, of a family that has unusual magnetic bio-fields:
> 
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mADlT9FALOs
> 
> Note: the last is NOT offered as a partial explanation for SHC itself - but
> only shows that there could be a hidden genetic factor in the accumulation
> of certain kinds of metal, in this case with strong external fields - and
> that this genetic factor itself is responsible for the SHC effect following
> initiation, but has yet to be isolated. This would be true even if the video
> turns out to be some kind of hoax.
> 
> For instance, if there were found real evidence (transmutation isotopes), in
> the analysis of the ash of SHC - or tritium for instance - to suggest a
> valid LENR connection, then a genetic trait which might contribute to that
> would be a propensity for the tissues (or bone surfaces, most likely) of the
> victim to accumulate an "active metal" or catalytic alloy - not palladium,
> since it is rare, but possible an alloy of nickel perhaps with lithium or
> boron. Plus we suspect that tobacco is an accumulator of radionuclides.
> Tobacco abuse is often seen in SHC victims.
> 
> http://www.webspawner.com/users/radioactivethreat/
> 
> It is all fascinating, and if you look closely at only the "mundane"
> explanation, it only gets you as far as the combustion initiator, and
> possibly the source of some of the radioactivity - but not to the complete
> anomaly and unusual reaction, so to speak, which notably does not spread
> beyond the victim.
> 
> Then - moving a little further afield, there is the idea of a "troubled
> soul", but let's not go there. We are already over the top of most "BS
> alarms" (including my own).
> 
> Jones
> 
> 
> 

                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Show them the way! Add maps and directions to your party invites. 
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/events.aspx

Reply via email to