Stephen A. Lawrence wrote: > > harry veeder wrote: > > Weber's theory predicts a force (distinct from a lorenz force) > > Could you be a bit more specific here? > > Last I heard the Lorentz force, F = q(E + vxB), fully explained the > behavior of charged particles in E and B fields. This clipping basically summarizes Weber's force: http://web.ncf.ca/eo200/weber_clipping.JPG It comes from the paper "Weberian Induction" http://www.ifi.unicamp.br/~assis/Phys-Lett-A-V268-p274-278(2000).pdf harry > Do you know any evidence that this is not the case? > > > > arising > > from the relative motion between positive and negative charges > such as > > inside a current carrying wire where electrons move past protons. > > > > Harry > > > > > > > > > > > >
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary Resis... Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary Resis... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary Resis... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary ... Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary Resis... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary ... Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Station... Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary Resis... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary ... David Jonsson
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary ... Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary Resis... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary Resis... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary ... Stephen A. Lawrence
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary Resis... Harry Veeder
- Re: [Vo]:The Electric Field Outside a Stationary Resis... Harry Veeder

