-Delete the Paranoia-JO'S-
 

The last thing that I have to say Re: Tom Friedman & fusion:  Achieving 
managable & sustainable Fusion/Plasma &/or Cold is more than merely speaking 
enthusiastically of the general, various, & sundry forms of 'alternative 
energy.'  Fusion/plasma &/or cold is the Holy Grail for the sustained & 
positively evolving progress of the ongoing well being of mankind and the 
biosphere that we all inhabit collectively.  

 

Our absolute planetary-imperitive/must-do/no-B.S. of healing our 
Terran-Eco-System depends on the future fusion-hubbed greater green 
alternative-energy global power grid.  I believe that Tom Friedman to be a 
vocal & very strong proponent of this very stance. I am persuaded that Tom 
Friedman is a very-heavy guy; one of the heaviest.  And Tom is also one of the 
'best & sanest-voices' on the planet as well.  Tom is also fully, competently, 
& formidably equipped to defend, articulate, & champion his own ideas without 
my, nor your assistance.

Alternative Green-Energy in general is simply the one & only sane course for 
the nations of our planet to adopt.  Anything less is simply planetary suicide; 
and that 'not' in the too-far-off approaching future.  In short we all  perish 
together on a bio-dead depleted & polluted planet sooner than later if we do 
not planetarily pull our collective minds & zealous mutual cooperation out of 
the 'dark-place.'  I think Tom's dialogues on these salient points definitely 
alludes to said Fusion-Manhattan Project/21st century being fully engaged and 
likely down the road-a-piece.  This is very good news.
 
Specifically; sustainable fusion &/or 'near-fusion/high-energy plasma-flow' 
technoloy is the pot-at-the-end-o-the-rainbow for mankind to achieve that both 
lofty & crucially dyer goal of Eco-regeneration.  This is the 'Phoenix'  and 
I'm relatively positive that Tom Friedman &/or any sane &/or half-intelligent 
earthling would not take exception to nor disagree with that premise.
 
My final comment on Tom Friedman is this:  Whatever Tom Friedman of the NYTimes 
has to say on Alternative-Energy severally &/or pertaining to Sustainable 
Fusion & related alternative energy subjects specifically bears paying very 
close attention to.-The End-(for the moment)-JO-
 
 
 
 
> Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:16:48 -0400
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> From: [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Vo]:The two irritating Nates
> 
> Jack O Suileabhain wrote:
> 
> >Tom Friedman NYTimes: The most telling element in this entire 
> >extended discourse, is of course, Tom Friedman's sudden infatuation 
> >with this subject.
> 
> That's wrong. Friedman has been promoting and writing about 
> alternative energy for many years, before it was fashionable. He 
> seems to know a lot about the subject, although I get the impression 
> it is "surface" knowledge. He did not mention any of the problems 
> with photovoltaic devices such as the long energy payback time. He 
> did not suggest solar-thermal instead.
> 
> - Jed
> 

                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Invite your mail contacts to join your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. 
It's easy!
http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&mkt=en-us

Reply via email to