~?Why the 'Nate's' dodge?~
Answer: Find out who pulls the 'Nate's' strings and you'll know who's getting extremely tangible/proactive results with the research. Once again the policy of Red Herring aka disinformation try's to decoy &/or discourage proponents such as yourself either totally away from the work or discredit you out of the potential that real fiscal investors would be motivated into hooking up with such as yourself. They monitor 'Vortex' and your responses. Vortex is an easy mark. EMC2Fusion's newest 'wow' project upgrade comes via the United States Navy for Weapons Research. These people tolerate 'no' possibly promising parallel &/or competing research along 'any' sustained fusion avenues of potentially successful approach &/or whatever they deem potentially a thing of significant 'weapons' potential. So your 'debunker-Nates' are likely paid &/or controlled shills of these entities that are sponsoring emc2fusion. ~JO~ Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:58:32 -0400 To: [email protected]; [email protected] From: [email protected] Subject: [Vo]:The two irritating Nates I wrote: Friedman is buddy-buddy with one of the other hard-core opponents . . . I did not mean to include the word "other" here, which implies that Friedman is a hard-core opponent. I doubt that he knows much about it. But he did mention his good friend who is in the opponent's camp. As I recall, it was Lewis. If Friedman ever thought about the subject, I expect he asked Lewis, and I know what the answer would be. Lewis is a jerk. I printed out the entire NSF/EPRI conference and I am reading all papers and comments carefully. Lewis gave a good presentation laying out potential problems with cold fusion, especially recombination and the separation factor that may concentrate tritium in the electrolyte. Then he sits through several presentations that prove beyond question his concerns are moot. They are legitimate, but they they were tested for and ruled out. He asks the speakers detailed questions to confirm this. So, why didn't he say so, publicly?!? He should have announced: "although the problems I cited earlier in the year are real, recent research has ruled them out." What's the matter with that? Lewis starts his presentation by saying that electrochemists all know what he has to say, and the presentation is for people in other fields. Fair enough. It it is a fine presentation, well worth reading. The thing is, he is sitting there with the creme de la creme of 20th century electrochemistry: Fleischmann, Bockris, Huggins, McKubre and others. Does he think they have not heard of recombination? When they demonstrate that recombination can't possibly be an issue, because they used closed cells and for other reasons, why doesn't he acknowledge that?!? Also in attendance are leading experts in tritium, such as Storms and Talcott (Carol -- now Miz. S.). They and others demonstrate many reasons why separation cannot be an issue. Talcott displays a slide with a co-author's v.c.: Roland A. Jalbert *25 years working with tritium and tritium detection * involved in the development, design, and inplementation of tritium instrumentation for 15 years * for 12 years he has had prime responsibility for the design, implementation, and maintainance of all tritium instrumentation at a major fusion technology development facility (Tritium Systems Test Assembly). * Consultant on tritium instrumentation to other fusion energy facilities for 10 years (Tokamak Fusion Test Reactor at Princton) So why the heck does Lewis still, to this day, claim these people don't know tritium when they see it? I am sure he did not sleep through the presentations, because he made comments. (All Q&A comments are transcribed, and some are more interesting than the papers.) The two irritating Nates were at this meeting: Nate Lewis and Nate Hoffman. Alan Bard of the ERAB panel was also there, and also irritating. - Jed _________________________________________________________________ Share your memories online with anyone you want. http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/products/photos-share.aspx?tab=1
