Horace: Wer'e running in parallel tracks here and ultimately the 'relative difference between the our two (maybe 'mirror theoretical models') maybe merely semantic ultimately.
I would have said that all 'energy contructs' aka waves/particles/wavicles within the SuperM-Brane have relative Speed-Density . And relative to 'particle's' (and waves)graduating speed-densitys they have such relative to an EVER-INCREASING PARTICLE SPIN. The graduating Speed-Densitys mirror relative spin-twist whose action is the VARY PROCESS OF GRAVIONIC INTERACTION. Hense 'inertial gravity' versus 'gravity at rest' become OBSOLETE VIEWS. RELATIVE SPEED DENSITY to SPIN-TWIST determines GRAVIONIC INTERACTION of which ELECTRO-MAGNETISM is NOT REALY A SEPARATE FORCE but rather a simple measure of RELATIVE GRAVIONIC-CENTRIFIC POLARITY juxtaposed to RELATIVE SPEED-DENSITY. And thusly the particle-spin 'gravitionally-gathers/compresses'/gravitationally-pulls at a greater spin-twist rate compared to a 'wave' as a helicoid-wave-string phenomenon whose relative 'slower spin-twist' is 'tubular' and whose speed-density/hense/gravity is gavitionally weaker. My 'cotton-candy' illustration describing relative gravionic attraction is the best I can do at present. And maybe unique to my theory is that at the '1-hydrogen' speed-density level the PROTON creates atomic-electrovalent shellicle-field structures as actually gyro-toroidal MINI-GRAY WHOLE SYSTEMS whose speed-density is thus MINI-WORMHOLED to PARALLEL/ADJACENT DARK SPACE. And I've called this of late TACHYON-Carrier-Wave SuperM-Space/DarkEnergySpace. SO DARKSPACE via PROTON-TOROID CENTRES is 'gravionically-sheet-pulled-drawn TO 'outer-Bubble-Border DARK SPACE which is actually the action that ALEXANDER KASHLINSKY & others have been observing. THUS IS MY MODEL of 'Singularity Physics' based upon a FLUID DYNAMICS PREMISE relative to thue UBIQUITOUSLY CONTIGUOUS SuperM-Sheet/Brane. And the above would be the explanation of 'Spooky Action @ a Distance.' And thus this theory predicted Alexander Kashlinsky's DARK FLOW NASA's (outer-Aexoverse) super-gravity observations and PREDICTED THEM as well rather nicely. And NASA became 'interested' at that point. Of course the 'jury' is still out; but I made a minor stir along the way. And in short I would NOT tend todispute your basic descriptions of Photons though I would tend to describe 'Gravi-Photon's' AS the relative 'gravionic-fie.d-drawing action' upon adjacenty regional space and adjacent objects by the Photon as yet a 'tubular helicoid-wavicle' rather than a discreet gravi-photonic-particle. And so Photon's gravionic impetus would function as being contiguous constructs- upon the SuperM-sheet. So the 'gravi-photon' discription as discreet virtual-particles along with Photons as other than a 'wave-crest-lobe' upon 'helicoid light-string-wavicle,' I obviously have some variance with. MY BIG PROBLEM is that I don't tend to calculate that said 'particles' reacting as being SOVEREIGN phenonmenon rather than being CONNECTED ORGANELLES upon a contiguous Membrane much as is the observable case with the intercellular/nuclear functions of living cells. 'SuperM-Brane fluid dynamics' is my alternative premise which is causitive of our major divergence points. Hense my (not disrepectful) apparent disregard of the usual mathmatic-calculations relative to 'strong-force/weak-force' calculations etc. But I must say that your basic Mirror-Matter premise is VERY INTRIGUING and that I think would do equally well within my model as well as yours. So maybe I'm merely parsing semantics after all. I would tend to 'inflate quantum calculations;' though not dispute the relative interactional proportionate effects of your 'force-to-particle' calculations rendering a much higher yield-potentials of those quantum-forces. And that is because if 'all forces' are being acted upon more-or-less equally by OUTER DARKFLOW action then the resultant 'dampening-effect' upon the APPARENT sub-nuclear/&/nuclear interacation of those relative 'forces' upon each other is MUCH MORE PROFOUND/POWERFUL than we 'seem' to observe. AND IF I AM CORRECT that since ALL ATOM's PROTONS are indeed MICRO-GRAY-HOLEs-(relatively balanced)-SINGULARITIES internally feeding inject-plasma to our entire relatively-low energy density Bubble Universe; and thusly DARK SPACE via Proton-Micro-Gray Hole Toroid Singularity Centres gravionically attaches to DARK SPACE PARALLEL DARKFLOW/DarkEnergy parent AEXOSPACE as the 'back of the tapestry;' Then indeed the very concept to 'weak' & 'strong' inter-nuclear forces needs dramatic revision. And the agonic/antigonic fluid-dynamic action of DarkEnergy upon DarkEnergy defines ELECTRO-PLASMIC-GYRO-TOROIDAL GRAVIONICS at every level. And the electro-valent gyro-axial flow field is the VERY EVENT HORIZON ENERGY FLOW SYSTEM of the Proton as GrayHole MicroSingularity system. And this same 'gyro-toroidal-axial field-flow' pattern is REPEATED AT EVERY LEVEL of Cosmic energy sub-systems. AGAIN FORGIVE THE 'WORDY' exchange. Regards/Jak Harbach O'Sullivan From: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Vo]:Horace: Mirror Matter vs Tachyon Carrier Wave SuperM-Brane Theory Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:43:12 -0800 To: [email protected] On Aug 11, 2009, at 8:16 AM, Horace Heffner wrote: Under my theory, both matter and mirror matter create graviphotons, and these interact weakly with mirror near force electromagnetic forces, virtual photons. That should read: "Under my theory, both matter and mirror matter create graviphotons, and these interact weakly with near field electromagnetic forces, i.e. with virtual photons, just as photons interact with the comparatively weak gravitational force." Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/ _________________________________________________________________ Windows Live: Make it easier for your friends to see what you’re up to on Facebook. http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_facebook:082009
