>From Jed: > This removes any doubts about Robert Park. He has not given one inch. Not > one nanometer. I think Steve Krivit and some other people detected a change > in his attitude back when he said that cold fusion "is science." Perhaps he > meant the neutron studies only, or perhaps he changed his mind again. > > Anyway, he is unimportant. If it wasn't him it would be someone else playing > his role. As Ed Storms says, the only reason anyone gives credence to Park's > views on cold fusion is because many establishment people agree with him. In > the case of cold fusion, he is not an opinion maker, but merely one who > echoes a widespread opinion. > > - Jed
At this point I'm more curious about the recent behavior of 60 Minutes in removing APS's implied approval/endorsement of Garwin's analysis. What's going on there? Regards Steven Vincent Johnson www.OrionWorks.com www.zazzle.com/orionworks
