Robin, I will return to that tomorrow hopefully - got distracted with a minor success today ... however, I would be interested in hearing exactly what you see as the ultimate source (of putative excess energy)?
If I am not mistaken, you thought it to be nuclear mass- at one time, but that causes all sorts of problems the deeper one looks into it (i.e. the specifics of how and why). Jones --- Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jones wrote: > > >Robin -oops ... looks like I left out a "not" as in > >"not have" but anyway, on another reading, let me > >retract previous message and start over with a > >hopefully new and improved version. > > > Ok, I'll reply when you post it. > Regards, > > Robin van Spaandonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >
