Come on, you're more of a scientist than most people with a scientific degree!
I didn't mean published necessarily in a scientific journal BTW, are those results on a web page maybe, or can you just tell us what they consisted in? Cheers, Michel ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 5:30 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Knudsen machine? Semi-conductors > Michel wrote: > > >> Interesting! Are those results published somewhere Michael? > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Michael Foster" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> >> > >> > I use one of these, but not for semiconductors. I >> doesn't sputter, it deposits thin films by thermal >> evaporation, but in a more controlled fashion than simple >> filament evaporation. My "Knudsen Cell" is a >> special custom built (by me) version used primarily for >> high refractive index coatings. >> > >> > Back when I was still doing CF experiments I used it >> to deposit palladium on both Raney nickel and activated >> charcoal. So doing I got much better and more definitive >> results than Mr. Arata. I imagine this is because the >> palladium had never been exposed to air or water vapor >> before the introduction of deuterium. > > No, I'm not a scientist and Mr. Park and his ilk have made sure you can't get > a patent on these devices. I don't keep the type of careful methodical > records necessary for a scientific paper so I haven't published anything. > Furthermore I lack any scientific degrees, so it's doubtful anyone would > accept a paper from me. > > M. > > > >
