--- Terry Blanton wrote: > It looks like the importance of the resonant > coil coupling.
The idea is that there is a self-generated spatial feedback mechanism at work, which is gainful, and which is derived from the combined magnetic and RF parameters of the device. How these parameters interact to be gainful is not yet clear. At one time last month, it seemed to me that the LEDs were themselves "active" to received energy, but now the locus of gain appears not to be there (LEDS) but instead appears to be in the high-Q wound inductor coil when that coil has the Avramenko plug attached and an open ended wire (which of course transmits RF). The RF field which is generated seems to be contained and focused into a much smaller area than would be expected from a normal RF transmission, even at such low power. As synchronicity would have it, there is a recent article from MIT of interest in the news, which is relevant. They were able to light a 60 W light bulb from a power source seven feet away with no physical connection between the source. Tesla did this, of course. But it is the detail of the new method, and not the feat itself, which is newsworthy. BTW this story is coming from MIT, and of course they are not claiming a gainful feedback mechanism by any means. Here is ome article: http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2007/wireless-0607.html Google even has an entry on "witricity" (pronounced "Y-tricity") http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WiTricity However, Dr Stiffler's more advanced circuit seems to be gainful, and the difference there is a second, layered interaction. MIT did not use the Avramenko plug. "WiTricity" or wireless electricity is the same idea Nikola Tesla invented and worked on during the early 1900s. What took us so long to get back to it? The anomaly, even in the MIT 'mild' version, seems to be that the resultant energy transfer field is somehow "more" than just an RF radio transmission, which is very inefficient as a power source, and that "space" itself becomes activated in a more constrained geometry. In the case of the Stiffler SEC, "space" seems to be activated further, so as to deliver more energy than the stimulus. If the claimed energy extraction is real, then it is probably a form of ZPE coherence. BION even at MIT, as conservative as they are ... they make a rather large distinction between "magnetic waves" and "electromagnetic waves" which is more than a semantic distinction, but this is just the starting point for the next big step, IMHO. The advance made by Dr. Stiffler, and personally it seems to me to be a major breakthrough, is that by using the Avramenko plug in addition to magnetic waves, he is able to layer two different kinds of wave-properties constructively, perhaps in a resultant cross-field, which apparently produces an unexpected interaction which is gainful on the receiving-end. I will add the usual caveat. Overunity has not been proved. There are strong hints, and Dr S. believes that there is bona fide overunity. I trust his appraisal of the situation, but I do not expect others to be convinced until independent verification arrives. If he is correct, independent verification will arrive soon. And needless to say, following that, the world will be a very different place. >From everything which is out there today in "alternative energy", from the simple to the complex, it appears to this observer that there is a "quickening" under way, and that we are poised on the brink of perhaps several major breakthroughs... ...and not a moment too soon. Jones
