(The MIBs are at Frank again. :-) On 8/30/06, Zell, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read about this effect and I don't understand it's relationship to supposed free energy. I've read stuff by Aspden about it and I don't comprehend why he sees this effect as having a bearing on free energy generation. On the other hand, I think he has some good points about "ether". If empty space has permittivity and offers radiation resistance, how can it be "nothing" or not involve some sort of medium? If we keep giving properties to the "vacuum", when do we return to it to being "ether"? If it walks and quacks like a duck, is it a duck?
Of course it is. When I discovered the Beta-atmosphere/aether held materials together at the atomic level and attractive forces were as insubstantial as vacua in the Alpha-atmosphere I realised immediately that Science needed turning inside out. Read the published papers and associated info in the File and Photo sections of the Yahoo Beta-atmosphere Group. http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Beta-atmosphere_group/ If they don't convince you that the aether is real and substantial then I can't imagine anything will - ever the Gamma-atmosphere evidence of Stoern's "perpetuum mobile". Frank Grimer
