Also, for what it's worth, one way to create a vortex and avoid a limiting reaction that occurs is...
To wind a coil around a wire and then wind that compound wire (though it works with less or more recursiveness) around another and make that into a loop. This resolves the polarity issue (friction between positive and negative charges) Use a superconductor, this resolves the polarity issue as there is no resistance. To use electrical polarization (Cap Warp) to separate charges from collision. Use dielectric materials to create the field, then everything flows in one direction, rarely used. Use a curved not square Swastika design in the center, this directs energy from the center to help the vortex (the energy in the center is the focally inverted radiation pressure from the resistance of the ring. You can also use energies from the right elements, this is a pairing system where the "aetheric" or "radionic" characteristics of energy from one element will move very freely in a conductive path made of an element or which has some number in it's structure that is 4 places distant in the 8 step octave system, so 29 Copper is good with 25 Manganese or 33 Arsenic and as it's a 8 step octatave you can use say 57 also which is the number of undulations in the basketweave coil that Hendershot used. This also is also likely that when.Howard Menger made his first design, he thought he wound 50 turns (is a state that he described as hypnotic and with imperfect recall) but I think one came off as Aluminium 13 works in this way with 49, or maybe some of the connection he made but could never recall perfectly he made to the coil made one turn act distinctly as a separate turn. There are other ways, you can pull out one polarity in various ways, you can pull out both electrical polarities. You can use 24 or 4 and 6 (4x6=24 of course, 24 connects to both numbers and each bring a lot of energy). A circle of 5 nodes with 3 spaces 90 degrees apart and the other 2 at 60 degrees apart will be resonant with 4 and 6 and can easily achieve antigravity. There are many other ways. You don't need animated fields, though they are nice. High rate of change is powerful at affecting the aether, but not needed. On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 10:47 PM Jonathan Berry < [email protected]> wrote: > The coil around it is the samy type that I made that I could feel project > a tangible energy. > And it's also the same as used by some other Russians which resulted in a > signal remaining in space after the coils was removed. > > It's the same structure as that of the Evo which Bob Greenyer has been > seeing, it's like a stack of donuts forming a bigger donut. > > On the subject of Special Relativity. Lorentz contraction was not made to > make the one way speed of light C, rather it was made to > make the round trip C when the speed of light isn't C in either direction. > By virtue of the fact that it was NEVER designed to make the one way speed > of light C and in fact slowing down your clock and shortening your ruler > makes oncoming superluminal like even more superluminal in fact. > > So that Special Relativity, which NEVER mentioned the one way speed of > light in the 1905 document BTW used Lorentz contraction means that Special > Relativity is falsified. > If the speed of light were already C then it wouldn't need Lorentz, but it > insists Lorentz effects happen. > But if it uses Lorentz then the one way speed of light is pushed FURTHER > from C by Lorentz Effects necessarily! > > And if we can assert that the one way speed of light CANNOT be C in all > inertial frames of reference, then we know there is a prefered frame. > And not only does LET fit with 100% of the evidence that supports SR, but > GR actually has frame dragging and expanding of the universe, all of which > necessitates a medium to be moved, it can't move or have any motion vectors > if it's not got any frame of reference. > > The evidence is clear, there is stuff in the background of space to be > moved, and that is apparent even if there weren't an Aether. > > So we can do an end-run on Physics if we move it, and asymmetry, wobble, > it's all mentioned yet again by Podkletnov, and also having electric and > magnetic fields parallel, something I've been saying since the mid 90's and > again the basis of my coil mentioned earlier, the Russians, the current > work of Podkletnov, Hans Coler's device (and a patent suggesting he ripped > it off?) and more much more. > > > On Sat, Sep 6, 2025 at 5:25 PM William Beaty <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> New Tim Ventura 2025 interview with Eugene Podkletnov, the spinning-HTSC >> guy. >> >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ol3K_mXhJ9U >> >> He says the supercon disk is long abandoned, instead now using small >> metal >> disks spinning at 15K RPM, also few-KG disk-shaped coil-assemblies which >> can lift off from the lab bench (pulled down by connecting cables.) But >> TERAHERTZ? At KILOWATTS? mm-wave microwave ...with coils? I doubt >> that >> (unless he's using Gyrotrons as power supplies.) >> >> Apparently Podkletnov is now a torsion-fields guy, Akimov/Shipov and >> Russian secrets got from WW2 German research, via their version of >> project >> Paperclip. His device flys because it punches a hole in the "Physical >> Vacuum," and hence is sucked upwards? >> >> I think not enough info given to build your own. Apparently the power >> supply is "Tesla based." (How do we get kilowatts of mm-waves from >> that?) >> >> However, it seems that the long-pursued gravity effect is not from QM, >> not >> from Cooper pairs, london stuff etc. Instead, rotating metal disks will >> do it, also unmoving metal with rotating b-fields, at few kilowatt scale >> (only few minutes before his small coils burn up.) >> >> However, is all this material appearing in his advertised PDF book? >> (dunno if it's even available, haven't looked.) >> >> Note: when he experimented with VandeGraaff generators coated with HTSC >> layer in liquid helium, the violet spider-shaped discharge associated >> with >> "gravity pulses" is a familiar effect, not difficult to produce it with >> any classroom VDG electrostatic machine. Perhaps, as with these gravity >> experiments, HTSC and liquid helium isn't a requirement for launching the >> claimed gravity-pulses (see the old "Morton Effect" from 1990s >> discussion, http://amasci.com/freenrg/morton1.html. When I attempted >> replication, I only obtained the "spider shaped" long purple discharges.) >> >> Here's my own 3-phase Tesla coil, failed startup-corp from 2018 >> >> http://amasci.com/graphics/tesla/SAM_1254b.jpg >> http://amasci.com/graphics/tesla/SAM_1253b.jpg >> http://amasci.com/graphics/tesla/SAM_1635b.jpg >> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ikqs1Qbtpdg >> >> All of the above is to drive the toroid to 10MHz resonance-plus-rotation, >> and the toroid was the power supply for another device not shown. >> >> Tim Ventura video capation below >> >> (((((((((((((((((( ( ( ( ( (O) ) ) ) ) ))))))))))))))))))) >> William J. Beaty SCIENCE HOBBYIST website >> billb at amasci com http://amasci.com >> EE/programmer/sci-exhibits amateur science, hobby projects, sci fair >> Seattle, WA 206-762-3818 unusual phenomena, tesla coils, weird sci >> >> Dr. Eugene Podkletnov describes a new 2025 gravity modification >> experiment >> using toroidal coils to levitate several kilograms of mass and discusses >> historic research with YBCO superconductors. >> >> In this latest experiment, Dr. Podkletnov describes using toroidal >> solenoids with complex windings operating near the terahertz frequency >> range to produce a levitation effect. He claims this effect lifts uses >> kilowatts of energy to levitate several kilograms of weight, lasting 15 >> to 20 seconds before the device overheats. >> >> Podketnov describes the physics of this device in relativitistic terms, >> with the creation of a "gravitational well", where the experimental >> device >> "continually falls into the well". He is very clear that this is not a >> repulsive effect - in other words, the device is falling upward, not >> pushing against the test stand, workbench, or floor. >> >> Podkletnov also discusses his past collaborative efforts with a number of >> notable researchers, including Dr. Ning Li, George Hathaway, Ron Koczor, >> Glen "Tony" Robertson, Anatoly Akimov, and many others. >> >> In the 1990's, Dr. Podkletnov focused on researching an effect described >> as "gravity shielding" over a rotating YBCO superconductors, featured in >> the 1996 Wired Magazine article, "Breaking The Law Of Gravity". In the >> early 2000's, he collaborated with Dr. Giovanni Modanese on an Impulse >> Generator that utilized a Marx-generator discharge onto a superconducting >> emitter to generate a beam of gravitational force. In 2020, he described >> a third experiment ion-impregnated gold foil on a rotating disk to >> generate gravity shielding without YBCO superconductors. >> >> ABOUT OUR GUEST: >> >> Dr. Eugene Podkletnov is a chemist and materials science expert known for >> his experimental research into gravity modification using YBCO >> superconductors. >> >> Dr. Podkletnov made global headlines in the 1990’s for his experiments >> with gravity shielding in rotating disks made from ceramic >> superconducting >> materials. His accomplishments include collaboration on physics theory >> with Dr. Ning Li’s team, consulting on materials engineering with NASA >> MSFC for 3 years, and co-authoring papers on gravitational impulse >> experiments with Dr. Giovanni Modanese. >> >> Dr. Podkletnov has a PhD from the Moscow University of Chemical >> Technology, Mendeleyev Institute and spent 15 years at the Institute for >> High Temperatures of the Russian Academy of Sciences. He received a >> second >> PhD from Tampere University of Technology in Finland. He has been >> featured >> in numerous times in major broadcast and print media outlets, and joins >> us >> today to discuss his ongoing research in emerging physics. > >
