Yes, I remember the positive magnetic field matched to several signifant figures.
I am still trying to search up the Romanian paper—it seems to have gone dark/ I think I have it in my doenloads. Bob Cook Sent from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows From: Robin<mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2023 1:53 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:high weirdness https://www.networkworld.com/article/3191503/mit-selling-8-million-coveted-ipv4-addresses-amazon-a-buyer.htmlIn reply to bobcook39...@hotmail.com's message of Mon, 13 Feb 2023 19:21:07 +0000: Hi, >Even WEIRDER: > >If the positive terms of a series of terms that exactly express a magnetic >dipole field (such as positrons and electrons display) and that mass as we >know it is composed of positrons and electrons with some neutrinos to keep >them front destructive change to photons, a random orientation of such >magmatic dipoles in a massive population acts like GRAVITY. Is it of the same magnitude? > > >THIS COMMENT STEMS FROM WORK REPORTED BY A ROMAUN GROUP OF SCIENTISTS IN THE >CORNELL U DIGITAL LIBRARY several years ago. I REMEMBER THAT THE GROUP WAS >ASSOCIATED WITH THE UNIVERSITY IN THE CAPITAL. > >Bob Cook [snip] Cloud storage:- Unsafe, Slow, Expensive ...pick any three.
