Cosmology is the gossip kitchen table for sidelined physicists....
Enjoy the nice pictures of galaxies but do not believe any version
II,III etc. of bibles genesis like big bang.
Most fake facts about black holes have been debunked as nonsense simply
because real physics cannot work with singularities.
Same for GR waves LIGO...
We have more serious problems to solve!
J.W.
On 25.08.2022 17:53, H LV wrote:
Eric Lerner argues the "unexpected" data from the JWST is expected in
an non-expanding universe. Of course if the universe is not expanding
he also says explaining the hubble redshift relation would require
some new physics.
Harry
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:32 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
As Lerner admits, the CMB is the main thing which is holding the
big bang theory together.
Yet the 'experts' really can't explain exactly how CMB radiation,
which is moving away from us at light-speed from a single point in
time, manages to somehow magically be reflected back so as to be
observed by us as a rather strong signal.
Maybe CMB should not be observable in 3 space at all.
IOW - it can be argued that the cosmic background is itself poorly
understood and not the best feature with which to base important
derivative theories on (like the big bang)...
H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote:
Eric Lerner comments on the first data from the JWST:
The Big Bang didn't happen
What do the James Webb images really show?
https://iai.tv/articles/the-big-bang-didnt-happen-auid-2215
Eric Lerner's claims are deflated in this article:
https://www.cnet.com/science/space/no-james-webb-space-telescope-images-do-not-debunk-the-big-bang/
Harry
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
