Turning the subject 45° on an axis for a moment, a large hovering diamond was filmed by multiple witnesses in Columbia the other day, links added to the list.
Could it be the same hovering diamond-shaped craft from Nick Pope's infamous office poster of a similar sighting in Scotland? Reverse-engineering somewhat from first principles: the object has mass and thus *is* gravitating - shedding momentum to gravity and time at a rate of 9.80665 kg-m/s per kg of gravitating mass, per second - yet if it's not accelerating relative to earth and its mass is also constant, then it is simultaneously accelerating upwards, gaining momentum from _some other_ fundamental force constant (such as the EM constant, alpha), in equal opposite magnitude. To put it another way, it must be applying an upwards acceleration - ie. a time rate of change of velocity being a rate of signed momentum exchange, or +/- dp/dt - thus implying that it must also be sinking equal rates of counter-momentum to gravity and time. We should reserve a degree of concern however that arresting an object's gravitational acceleration by any means of inertial suspension *does nothing,* in principle, to prevent the earth's own mutual gravitation towards _it._ Obvioushly, gravitational interactions are mutually inter-reactive - the larger body's accelerations are smaller, but real and non-trivial - and nested within each gravitational interaction there is an inertial interaction, N3 demanding perfect symmetry of momentum and counter-momentum deltas at all times; lifting a weight 'up' pushes the planet 'down' - we're really just prising 'em apart - and likewise both masses accelerate back together when the weight's dropped. _In other words,_ levitating masses may be 'towing' the planet. These things may be tug-boats, of sorts, applying small steering corrections to Earth's trajectory or resting momentum state.. even inadvertently, if not purposefully, this is a seemingly-inevitable implication of the physics we know. The act of merely hovering a massive body like this is not entirely passive, the object is _not_ stationary, but is rather holding constant distance to ground, which along with the rest of the planet is continually accelerating into the gravity well of a massive body that is not counter-accelerating reciprocally back towards it. As such, this behaviour should not be regarded as entirely passive, but rather interactive / manipulative.. and the fact that it is also 'surreptitious' (self-evident from basic physics but not negotiated with or communicated to us), naturally raises suspicion. Are these permanent changes to our resting momentum state, and the ultimate fate of the planet? 'Momentum' being among the most conserved of field properties.. are they an incidental and inconsequential side-effect of a benevolent scientific mission, or else the mission objective itself? And _then_ is the purpose in our interest or theirs? These things potentially have us on a leash.. basic physics tells us that what superficially _looks_ like 'anti-gravity' is, in practice, more akin to a tug applying a course-correction via a tractor-beam.
