It is not their constitutional right to censor.
------ Original Message ------
From: "Jed Rothwell" <jedrothw...@gmail.com>
To: "Vortex" <vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Sent: Sunday, 19 Sep, 21 At 15:55
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Copy of "A Brief Introduction to Cold Fusion" without
YouTube ads
AM ROGER ANDERTON <r.j.ander...@btinternet.com
<mailto:r.j.ander...@btinternet.com> > wrote:
shouldn't be allowed to be above the law and suppress freedom of speech
Freedom of speech only applies to the government. The government cannot
pass a law restricting freedom of speech. YouTube, the Washington Post,
FOX News or the Scientific American can restrict your freedom of speech
as much as they want. Scientific American will never print a letter from
a cold fusion researcher. That is their right. YouTube or Facebook can
delete any post they want, for any reason they want, or for no reason.
It is entirely up to them. The government cannot interfere with their
decision because freedom of speech includes the right to not publish
something. They cannot be forced to publish a statement.
If Facebook deletes too many messages that would be bad for their
business. People will stop using it. That is entirely a matter for
Facebook and their users to decide. The government has no role and their
decision to delete messages or ban people has nothing to do with
constitutional free speech.
2021-09-15-big-tech-censored-predictors-of-biden-vaccine-mandate-all-proven-correct.html
<https://youtubecensorship.com/2021-09-15-big-tech-censored-predictors-of-biden-vaccine-mandate-all-proven-correct.html>
I doubt this, but Big Tech can censor anything they want. That is their
constitutional right, as I said. I think FOX News censors more than they
do, but I am not keeping track.
