It strikes me that this is essentially the mechanism that Neal Graneau proposed to be responsible for the arc-liberated emission of energy in papers such as

https://www.academia.edu/download/38880867/Graneau-e-a-Arc-liberated-chemical-energy-exceeds-electrical-input-energy-2000.pdf

However, I dont beleive there is a phase change in the water that could be associated with such an energy release., which is one of the reasons why I dont think Neal's hypothesis holds water,

Nigel

On 13/07/2019 17:14, H LV wrote:
The wikipedia page does not mention the complementary phenomena of decalescence.


    Definition of /decalescence/

: the decrease in temperature when the rate of heat absorption during transformation exceeds the rate of heat input while heating metal through a transformation range

On Sat., Jul. 13, 2019, 11:14 a.m. bobcook39...@hotmail.com <mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>, <bobcook39...@hotmail.com <mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

    *Recalescence* is an increase in temperature
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temperature> that occurs while
    cooling metal <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal> when a change
    in structure with an increase in entropy
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entropy> occurs. The heat
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat> responsible for the change in
    temperature is due to the change in entropy. When a structure
    transformation occurs the Gibbs free energy
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gibbs_free_energy> of both
    structures are more or less the same. Therefore the process will
    be exothermic <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exothermic>. The heat
    provided is the latent heat
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_heat>.

    This concept described in Wikipedia seems like LENR to me.  It
    involves the 2^nd law regarding an increase of entropy in a
    coupled system as a result of as a result of a decrease of
    potential energy and an increase of kinetic energy.

    If the Sandia incident occurred during cooling while magnetization
    was ongoing, this alone would deserved a paper IMHO.

    However, Gibbs did not consider free energy associated with
    nuclear structures as being important in his theory.

    Note the BS associated with a constant Gibbs free energy (more or
    less the same) in 2 different phases associated with

    *Recalescence* .

    Bob Cook

Reply via email to