Didn`t David Nagel prefer the term Lattice Enabled Nuclear Reactions? Nagel's terminology can encompass this research.
My father who was skeptical but not closed minded about the field, thought it should have been called low temperature nuclear reactions instead of low energy nuclear reactions, since it is possible for individual atoms to have very high kinetic energies while the bulk of the lattice remains relatively cool. Harry On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 4:20 PM H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > Here is an infographic > > https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/Lattice-Confinement-Fusion-POC-with-PRC-links-July-17-Final-3.pdf > > Harry > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:57 PM Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> >> https://asiatimes.com/2020/09/nasa-lands-on-a-middle-path-to-nuclear-fusion/ >> >> NASA lands on a middle path to nuclear fusion >> >> Lattice confinement fusion breakthrough is in the promising Goldilocks >> zone between hot and cold fusion >> >> References: >> >> >> Novel nuclear reactions observed in bremsstrahlung-irradiated deuterated >> metals >> >> Bruce M. Steinetz et al. >> >> https://journals.aps.org/prc/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.044610 >> >> Nuclear fusion reactions in deuterated metals >> >> Vladimir Pines, Marianna Pines, Arnon Chait, Bruce M. Steinetz, Lawrence >> P. Forsley, Robert C. Hendricks, Gustave C. Fralick, Theresa L. Benyo, >> Bayarbadrakh Baramsai, Philip B. Ugorowski, Michael D. Becks, Richard E. >> Martin, Nicholas Penney, and Carl E. Sandifer, II >> >> https://journals.aps.org/prc/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevC.101.044609 >> >>
