Sounds interesting albeit I did not dig in very deep.
From SO(4) physics modelling we know that two orthogonally rotating
magnetic "masses" (flux) can generate a topological charge if these
start a third winding. What he calls the weak force is the second torus
rotating axes as all natural flux is generated by toroidal sources.
Because this second radius effect is tiny most people do neglect it. But
all EM fields have so called toroidal components if you do not carefully
design the sender to minimize them.
It would be interesting to see whether he can measure the second radius
induced force in relation to the first radius one.
Just to remind everybody: There is no magnetic force just based on a
magnet field. The force always works indirectly on charge/virtual charge !
J.W.
On 08.09.2020 18:37, Terry Blanton wrote:
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 1:18 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net
<mailto:jone...@pacbell.net>> wrote:
>
> One thought that comes up in designing a transportation device is
combining the Hamdi effect with "printed" magnets. Not sure if this
was mentioned in the earlier thread.
>
> There are several companies doing the printed field scheme and there
could be synergy with spinning a specially designed pattern.
>
>
https://www.popularmechanics.com/science/a20023/printed-magnets-polymagnets-smarter-every-day/
Jones,
I thought I had posted Hamdi's response to your comment; but, I can't
seem to find it. I guess it's better to post it twice than not at all:
*/Motion is defined by the rotation matrix 5.7 and the model is
validated by the solution 5.23 as the angular acceleration vector
derived from rotation matrix and the magnetic torque vector derived
from body orientation and the vector of the rotating field have same
unit vectors. There is a simulation animation on these videos
MBS-bounce.. Webm where the above equation applies to top body
(cylender) and the bottom object is also a free body consisting a
spherical magnet with a plastic ring around. /*
*/
/*
*/My main motivation about this reseach is it might show a way to
explain some quantum phenomena without quantum mechanics. /*
*/
/*
*/
/*
*/For example the Stern—Gerlach experiment which show the
two—valueness of electron magnetic orientation can be obtained by a
hypothetical magnetic object which can align to an external magnetic
field both parallel and antiparallel. Actually the effect I discovered
called torque-phi in my work is similar to this. /*
*/
/*
*/While the alignments of electrons in SG experiment in the brief time
while Ag atoms travel between magnets is said it is impossible, but
actually Paul Trap is based on this alignment and you need a small
field strength to keep proper magnetic orientation of trapped
particles. /*
*/
/*
*/In this view, SG experiment simply show bipolar alignment of Ag
atoms under an external field. /*
*/
/*
*/However in QM interpretation of SG it is said that electrons are
already polarized prior to subject SG magnets in a misterious way
since according QM spin has only two orientations up and down
regardless to reference direction, something unphysical but can be
modeled mathematically using QM. /*
--
Jürg Wyttenbach
Bifangstr. 22
8910 Affoltern am Albis
+41 44 760 14 18
+41 79 246 36 06
