On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 6:18 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote:
> Particle physics has originally been based on the rigid mass operator. > Unkluckily only a few physicists understand master level rotating mass > mechanics as this is a field used/covered by mechanical engineering. > > Why physics did use the fringe Virial approach (square integrable > functions..) is an enigma. May be most were mathematicians bare of any > physics understanding. > > The solutions of the rigid mass operator problems are torus surfaces! It > is thus no surprise that all particles can be modeled by higher order > tori! Of course we do not need any fantasy numbers or point masses... > > > J.W. > Is it your claim that mass is a function of the inertia of spinning energy -- here, in some toroidal form..? -- grok. > > On 27.06.2020 23:59, H LV wrote: > > I am not sure if this is related but I always had a problem with the > concept of a point mass or a point charge, since mathematically that would > imply infinite mass density or charge density or alternatively zero mass > and zero charge. However these conundrums are resolved mathematically by > moving from the real number system to the hyperreal number system first > formulated by Abraham Robinson in the early 1960s. The hyperreal number > system extends the real number system by including infinitely small > numbers and infinitely large numbers and gives a logical foundation for the > calculus of infinitesimals known as "non-standard analysis". Today most > physicists and students still learn calculus using "standard analysis" > which is based on the notion of limits and was developed by mathematicians > in the 19th century. > > An interesting property of infinitesimals is that they come in different > sizes. For example if ε is an infinitesimal then ε < 2 ε < 3ε > ...etc. > The reciprocal of an infinitesimal number is an infinite number, so there > are also different size infinities. For example 1/ε > 1/2ε > 1/3ε > ...etc. > > Harry > > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 5:35 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <ju...@datamart.ch> wrote: > >> The fantasy of the old SM guard always seemed to be limitless... >> >> SO(4) physics exactly explains how the claimed force "gravity" is >> generated and mediated between hadronic masses. >> >> Since about 1 year there is game over for SM. No more cheating with point >> particles that do not behave as points because these points have a magnetic >> moment. No more cheating with massless charge as such an assumption simply >> is a form of infantile dementia if no proof is given why a massless charge >> does move without inertia and no force is need for a circular orbit. Most >> idiotic is the assumption charge is wave as the magnetic moment then would >> oscillate. We can go on with this as you only need college level >> understanding to find out that the foundation of SM is children logic. >> >> >> J.W. >> On 26.06.2020 20:20, bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote: >> >> >> https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-cartoon-picture-of-magnets-that-has-transformed-science-20200624/ >> >> >> >> some INTERESTING OBSERVATIONS…. >> >> >> >> Loss of the directional control of angular momentum in nuclei is >> probably is associated with the creation of unstable nuclear conditions >> and isotopic transitions. It may also change gravity >> >> Of a group of nuclear magnetic dipoles, if the TOTAO magnetic dipole >> attraction is modified—either increases or reduced? *This question stems >> from the CONJECTURE that gravity results from an *random* collection of >> nuclear magnetic dipoles and the respective 0 (zero) net angular >> momentum. >> >> >> >> The calculation of an attractive magnetic field at large distances >> between randomly oriented groups of magnetic dipoles supports the >> CONJECTURE noted above IMHO. >> >> >> >> *http://downloads.hindawi.com/archive/1998/079537.pdf >> <http://downloads.hindawi.com/archive/1998/079537.pdf>* >> >> >> >> A better reference would be nice. >> >> . >> >> >> >> Bob Cook >> >> -- >> Jürg Wyttenbach >> Bifangstr. 22 >> 8910 Affoltern am Albis >> >> +41 44 760 14 18 >> +41 79 246 36 06 >> >> -- > Jürg Wyttenbach > Bifangstr. 22 > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > +41 44 760 14 18 > +41 79 246 36 06 > >
