Hmmm, I guess my humor is unclear...you spelled 'Nikola' as 'Nicola'. However, I will give you partial credit for bringing the thread back on topic with your Orch OR analogue.
On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 1:17 PM Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > Given the incredible track record of the guy - I would not want to be on > the opposite side of any argument with Elon... and he is strongly critical > of the potential of H2 in transportation. > > But that relates only to fuel cells and he is probably correct on that > point. However, the one (huge) tech which he could be overlooking is the > possibility that H2 could be used in one of the shrunken orbital methods - > Mills, Holmlid, etc. > > When used in a fuel cell - H2 can return something in the range of 1 eV > per atom net power. The potential is much more favorable if Rydberg or > similar power levels become available viable catalyzed shrinkage, which... > come to think of it... could be a semantic version of "Orchestrated > Objective Reduction"... as in hydrogen orbital reduction... > > > Elon Musk Mocks Nikola’s Hydrogen Cars, Explains Why Fuel Cells Won’t Work > <https://observer.com/2020/06/tesla-elon-musk-mocks-nikola-hydrogen-fuel-cell-electric-vehicle/> > > Elon Musk Mocks Nikola’s Hydrogen Cars, Explains Why Fuel Cells Won’t Work > > Sissi Cao > > “Fuel cells=fool sells,” Musk tweeted. > > <https://observer.com/2020/06/tesla-elon-musk-mocks-nikola-hydrogen-fuel-cell-electric-vehicle/> > > > Terry Blanton wrote: > > > However, I cannot forgive you for disgracing the name of the best > immigrant scientist of the last millennium, NiKola Tesla...Nikolamotor.com > and Toyota really want the fuel cell tech to work. Even Germany is banking > on H2 for the future; but, frankly Scarlett...wait...that's no longer > allowed...I gave up on hydrogen when Bob Lazar's modified Vette's valves > suffered embrittlement. > > >
