I have an open-ended question for this group, which I have great admiration for. I'm a biologist and am writing a book on, especially, the population problem. One of the chapters is on energy, mainly from the viewpoint of future energy sources. The only one I am at all even partly able to judge fairly is biomass, and to some extent solar, wind and similar 'standard' ones. I am helpless about nuclear, and like Daniel Yergin in "Quest" dont say much about it. What do y'all see as real possibilities in 50 years? regards, ken deboer
On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:30 AM Terry Blanton <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for the update! I hope Jack is in good health. He should be > around 80 yrs. > > Did anyone on the current Vort list participate in the Quantum Mind forum > at the University of Arizona in the early 90's. Not long ago, that list > was available still and I intended to d/l it; however, I can no longer find > it. <sigh> > > Those were fun times, including the summer Sarfatti invited Shipov to > California to discuss torsion fizzicks! :) > > Cheers! > > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:45 AM ROGER ANDERTON < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> History of it is alternative physics. >> >> Mainstream physics based on ignoring Einstein's search for unified field >> theory (UFT). >> >> But this alternative physics is built on it. >> >> Bohm was student of Einstein taking up UFT research. But Bohm ran into >> problems of being called a communist and ran foul of McCarthy Witch hunt. >> Similarly, Bohm's student Vigier ran into same sort of problem. >> >> Vigier Conferences named after physicist Vigier known as "The Heretic of >> France". >> >> Latest problem being looked at seems to be: the failure of Einstein's >> Equivalence Principle et al. When heat an object by E=mc2 would expect its >> mass to increase, but the opposite seems to happen. Paper abstract for this >> year's presentation at: http://www.noeticadvancedstudies.us/LoXII.pdf >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sunday, 31 May 2020, 16:27:35 BST, ROGER ANDERTON < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> many of them now go to Vigier Conferences, this year's organization of >> conference messed up by covid19 >> >> >> Vigier 12 <http://www.noeticadvancedstudies.us/index12.html> >> >> Vigier 12 >> >> <http://www.noeticadvancedstudies.us/index12.html> >> I video many of the talks. >> >> I think main theory being promoted (at moment) is Rowland's theory, talk >> by Michael Houlden: >> >> >> >> Michael Houlden talk on Rowlands' theory >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5sIV5lgW00&feature=youtu.be> >> >> Michael Houlden talk on Rowlands' theory >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k5sIV5lgW00&feature=youtu.be> >> >> Sarfatti hasn't been to Vigier Conference in ages. >> >> >> There is also ANPA Conference: >> >> >> Alternative Natural Philosophy Association - Alternative Natural >> Philosophy Association <http://anpa.onl/> >> >> Alternative Natural Philosophy Association - Alternative Natural >> Philoso... >> >> Alternative Natural Philosophy Association >> <http://anpa.onl/> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sunday, 31 May 2020, 16:17:39 BST, Terry Blanton <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> I'll answer for Jonesie. >> >> It's a bit older than that: >> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fundamental_Fysiks_Group >> >> On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:09 AM [email protected] < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Jones— >> >> >> >> Is the Fysics group you referenced the one that Allen Smith at LENR >> Forum organized? >> >> >> >> Bob Cook >> >> >> >> *From: *Jones Beene <[email protected]> >> *Sent: *Saturday, May 30, 2020 10:53 AM >> *To: *[email protected] >> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Orchestrated Objective Reduction >> >> >> >> all the members of the "Fundamental Fysiks Group" [sic] reportedly merged >> into a single quantum entangled meme... >> >> >> >> >> >> Terry Blanton wrote: >> >> >> >> ...and what ever happened to Jack Sarfatti? :) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
