LOL some years ago i had an interesting discussion re. 'monopoles' on PhysOrg:
https://phys.org/news/2014-01-physicists-synthetic-magnetic-monopole-years.html ...suffice to say, colour me skeptical.. ;) On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 5:29 PM Jürg Wyttenbach <[email protected]> wrote: > Axil: > > Even if you post this nonsense 10 more times it will never help to explain > the world. It's just a "legal" way to generate money for research. I here > mention that the breakthrough prize just has been given to a group that has > deep connections to the science (physics) self service money laundering > system (includes journals, reviewers, politics) for work about gravity > that nobody ever will use as it is even more outraging than the Higgs... > > All mass in the universe can be given as EM mass. CERN never ever will > find or has found a Higgs or an other fantasy particles like quarks. > > The Higgs masses are simple proton *resonances *and the quarks are the > same. > > A *resonance *is not a particle. The same holds for magnetic monopoles. > Magnetic flux travels at light speed and only strange minds can believe > such a flux can be generated/stopped out of nothing with an infinitely > strong force - when you e.g. use the outdated Einstein GER. > > > For all the "strange ideas" above completely new physics will be needed > with almost no relation to current definitions. Thus if you can provide > something - e.g. vacuum fluctuations - that explain how EM-flux is > generated out of nothing then you will be a hero & I would like It! > > > To say it once more the gravitation constant is given by the weak force in > SO(4) (generated by the complete coupled 5D charge rotation). It is > "absolutely exact"= as measured and also explains why gravitation is not > absolutely constant, because the coupling mass (electron weak force bound > orbit) in the 3D,t frame is slightly varying in nuclei with larger Z. > > > > J.W. > On 13.09.2019 03:53, Axil Axil wrote: > > Keith Fredericks > > > http://restframe.com/mm/authors/keith-fredericks/ > > > has presented his research on what he calls superluminal particles which > are magnetic monopoles at ICCS22. I found the theory that could underpins > Keith's finding in a cosmology course from MIT. > > > It involves the formation of a topological defect in the Higgs field. This > defect forms when a new Higgs field is created and the Higgs field combines > with the new Higgs field. This defect in the Higgs field forms a magnetic > monopole that is huge and powerful. A particle forms that has a mass of > 10^20 protons or about a microgram. This energy level produces a Higgs > field defect that meets the dense Higgs field level of 10^18GeV. > > > According to cosmology theory, monopoles from Higgs field cooling appeared > about 2 hours after the big bang. We know that this monopoles can form in > the present day to support LENR transmutation. > > > First, the particle is a Higgs field condensate and is tachyonic. The > Higgs field is a tachyonic field. This means that the monopole is not > superluminal but represents a disturbance in the Higgs field. > > > The lecture is informative from the start and is well worth the time to > view it in total. It explains how the Higgs field fits into both the > standard model and the standard cosmological model. It shows the math, and > then it explains the way dissimilar Higgs field interact. > > > For your convenience, I placed the video pointer of the lecture at 52:58 > to show the Higgs field spacifics. > > > This area of cosmology is well developed and can be accessed for further > study by googling "topological defect in the higgs field" > > > Transmutation in LENR is caused by the "higgs abyss" (for further study > google). The Higgs mechanism distorts the function of quarks due to their > mass redefinition. > > > In my opinion, Keith's presentation is the most significant presentation > of this conference and reveals the true nature of the NAE and the science > that supports it. > > > What is interesting about Keith Fredericks findings is that these > monopoles form spontaneously from the environment as well as those being > produced in LENR experiments. Keith Fredericks calls these particles cosmic > background. He shows them as the agent that produce tracks (strange > radiation) where matter loss occurs. > > > https://youtu.be/seBwiL9InII?t=3178 > > -- > Jürg Wyttenbach > Bifangstr. 22 > 8910 Affoltern am Albis > > +41 44 760 14 18 > +41 79 246 36 06 > >
