But chemical analysis of the output materiel showed that the CO was* not * chemically bound to at least one of those elements. In addition, the amount of this CO contamination would need to be 4.25 ton/day. That is 25% of the total output product. That amount of contamination is not possible to miss in a commercial operation selling to many customers.
It is more likely that your assumptions about how quantum mechanics operates in LENR is not well founded. On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:17 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 10 May 2019 19:55:16 -0400: > Hi, > [snip] > >The smelting charging function is computer automated and it must have been > >checked many times when the anomaly in the amount of output produce was > >first recognized. > > > >"The screened raw materials were taken using a conveyer system to the > third > >floor of the furnace and stored in > >separate over head bunkers. Each of the three raw materials were weighed > >according to *a computerized batching system* > >and transferred into charging buckets running on monorails in the second > >floor. Charging buckets then discharged the > >premixed raw materials into the furnace every 10–15 min through chutes. > >Shift-wise consumption of all raw materials > >was totalized to obtain daily (24 h) consumption data." > > ...but there was nothing wrong with the input. The problem is with the > output. > Note also that the electric power used matches the input materials, which > is a > good indication that the input is correct. > > The most likely explanation is that the weight of the output increased > because > something extra was in it. The author made the assumption that CO had > transmuted > to Fe & Si, rather than making the simpler assumption that the CO was > chemically > bound to at least one of those elements. > [snip] > Regards, > > > Robin van Spaandonk > > local asymmetry = temporary success > >
