More support for the magnetic flux tube posit on matter distruction as follows:
This matter distruction issue is common to most LENR reactor designs. It becomes apparent when the reactor is pushed to high energy production levels. For example, in an interview that Dennis Cravens had with Host Ruby Carat, he describes these pin holes seen in his reactor at 2:00 and states that his reactor fails when the power level produced get high. Cravens just ignores these holes and what causes them. This issue is a show stopper when it comes to producing a useful LENR reactor. Hear at between 2:00 and 3:30 into this interview. <https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.coldfusionnow.com%2Fpodcast%2FRuby-Carat-Dennis-Cravens-Cold-Fusion-Now-015.mp3%3A6HpHKlYZLvP-Yz_ofy8wHVRV9rs&cuid=2168707> https://disq.us/url?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.coldfusionnow.com%2Fpodcast%2FRuby-Carat-Dennis-Cravens-Cold-Fusion-Now-015.mp3%3A6HpHKlYZLvP-Yz_ofy8wHVRV9rs&cuid=2168707 We have seen these magnetic vortex flux tube generated pin holes develop in the meltdown of the LION reactor. This damage is a product of the inherent nature of the LENR active agent which is excited ultra dense hydrogen. This behavior of the active agent has been seen in about a half dozen reactor designs that have been analyzed by MFMP and is the basis of the O day presentation that Bob Greenyer will give ...sooner or later... Also see the holes rendered in this Russian paper on the first page https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=de&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.trinitas.ru%2Frus%2Fdoc%2F0231%2F004a%2F02311041.htm Investigation of the characteristics of MagnetoToroElectric Emanations with the help of photographic film detectors On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 4:07 PM Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > I think that what is going on is a change of state condition in the cloud > of electrons that cover the positive core of the ultra-dense hydrogen (UDH) > when the laser light hits the UDH. The Laser pulse greatly increases the > density of the polariton population in the electron cloud so that a Bose > condensate of polaritons forms. This condensate generates two chiral > polarized magnetic vortex flux tubes that just so happen to be compatible > with the flux tubes that bind quarks together. These UDH magnetic flux > tubes destabilize these valance quarks that these flux tunes touch and > produce a proton decay reaction that transforms protons to mesons (kaons). > > It is not a matter of raw power, but more like a key that exactly fits in > a sub nuclear particle lock, where the magnetic flux tune exactly fits the > mechanism that keeps protons and neutrons together. > > > > On Fri, Apr 5, 2019 at 10:36 AM JonesBeene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> A yellow-green laser pulse – according to Holmlid and replicated by >> Olafsson in Iceland and Zeiner-Gunderson in Norway – produces a large >> number of muons per pulse. They have performed sophisticated measurements >> to ascertain this. >> >> >> >> The photons of the laser which provides the input for the Holmlid effect >> have an individual mass-energy of less than one MeV. The Holmlid effect >> only works if there is a “target” of dense hydrogen, so somehow the >> interaction of coherent low energy photons with dense hydrogen performs a >> kind of magic. Input energy seems to be multiplied by a factor of a million >> to one. >> >> >> >> No one knows the exact details of how that initial laser energy is able >> to be multiplied to produce a massive number of muons but there could be a >> “backdoor” mechanism. The Holmlid effect output represents s more net >> gain per nucleon than nuclear fusion. One possibility to explain the >> situation is if “flipping the charge of protons” (conjugation) is done >> without brute force. That is the premise of the previous post. >> >> >> >> Specifically, by applying low energy photons to dense hydrogen, >> antimatter is first produced by charge conjugation - which antimatter then >> annihilates with matter, resulting in the subatomic debris called “quark >> soup” which then decays to mostly muons which are relatively long lived. >> >> >> >> Otherwise one needs brute force and a billion dollar particle >> accelerator in order to produce the same flux of muons which is measured >> by Holmlid et al. Since muon decay produces mostly neutrinos the actual >> useful net energy of this complete reaction is not huge, despite the large >> amount of mass which is involved. >> >> >> >> The best approach for achieving decent net gain is use the muons to >> produce “muon catalyzed fusion” before they decay. In fact, Holmlid suggest >> that this is already what has been happening in cold fusion – and >> researchers never thought to look for muons – which were there. >> >> >> >> Jones >> >> >> >> Hi Robin >> >> >> >> > In order to flip the charge, you probably need to add the difference in >> energy, >> >> i.e. 2 proton masses worth, or about 2 GeV. >> >> [snip] >> >> >> >> It is very doubtful that the entire mass-energy of a proton is to be >> found in charge alone which is the implication of what you are saying. >> >> >> >> For instance, a neutron with no charge has about the same mass-energy as >> a charged proton. I suspect the energy needed to conjugate charge in the >> proton is about the same as the difference in mass between the neutron and >> proton. >> >> >> >> >> >
