It has been recently determined that the polariton has negative mass and energy.
https://www.sciencealert.com/negative-mass-quasi-particle-polaritons-low-energy-lasers Wormhole theory requires that negative mass is required for a wormhole to form and to keep it open. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy This wiki associates negative energy to various quantum field effects including 2Quantum field effects <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy#Quantum_field_effects> - 2.1Casimir effect <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy#Casimir_effect> - 2.2Squeezed light <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy#Squeezed_light> - 2.3Hawking radiation <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negative_energy#Hawking_radiation> - 2.4Dirac sea On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 9:02 AM, Roarty, Francis X < [email protected]> wrote: > Axil, > > That was an interesting video. The polar nature of the > spots he highlighted on the dental film does justify the live monitoring he > is seeking. He does make an interesting comment that these polar arc > emissions from the LION reactor could be magnetic or gravity vortices, if > he is correct it further supports your suggestion of the quantum nature of > LENR. I only learned from your post that Hawking radiation is produced by > Polariton condensates but any relativistic effects occurring on these > surface metals are of interest to me, I have been proposing that Casimir > effect is actually relativistic in nature and your polariton > condensate/Hawking radiation on cavity surfaces as the likely engine > responsible for Casimir effect would make my argument easier. My pet theory > is that longer vacuum wavelengths are not actually “excluded” but rather > become time dilated to fit in the cavity and only appear shorter in > wavelength to our instruments outside the cavity…. A relativistic > interpretation of the “exclusion”. > > > > Fran > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2018 5:57 PM > > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > > Francis: I have seen enough published material that supports Hawkings > radiation as a energy output of polariton condensation to trust that > information. > > > > But the most revealing insights come from the meltdown of the LION > reactors. The observations that come out of that analisys is compelling to > me. That data provides a full picture of the quantum nature of the LENR > active agent. > > > > Take a look at some of that info from MFMP > > > > https://youtu.be/BhitBhess2E > > > > > > > > On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Roarty, Francis X < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Axil, I only suspect that *the mechanism that produces the vacuum effects > is Bose condensation * , you state it as fact, considering the polariton > science is still in its infancy, you may find that correlation is not yet > established and you may be treating a valuable insight like an > insignificant observation. > > > > Fran > > > > > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, May 09, 2018 4:11 PM > > > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > > *The mechanism that produces the vacuum effects is Bose condensation*, > The polariton just makes the formation of a condensate easy. The > polariton condensate acts as a black hole and the science about black holes > is well known. Hawking radiation as a fallout of the nature of the vacuum > is well-known and experimentally verified. > > > > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 7:39 AM, Roarty, Francis X < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Axil, I have some fringe concepts with respect to the current Casimir > theory that says longer virtual particles are simply excluded from these > cavities but it remains that the surface metal layer of these cavities is > not only a home for polaritons but also the critical interface between the > “excluded “ regions inside the cavity very much like the surface of water > effects the diffraction gradient of light. Regardless if my interpretation > of how these wavelengths are “excluded” I now question if Casimir effect > results directly from a polariton “dirfraction like” effect on vacuum > wavelengths. I would not be surprised if polaritons and Casimir effects are > 2 sides of same coin. > > Fran > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Monday, May 07, 2018 3:01 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > > Axil— > > > > Note that the larger more energetic palaritons do not exist on surfaces of > small nano- particles dimensions. If the “petal grafts” are correct, one > would not expect too much energy can be stored in nano- sized polaritons. > This may be effective in keeping the temperature down and avoiding > melting or sintering of the metallic lattice. > > > > This may be something else to consider in designing a robust LENR reactor > system. > > > > Bob Cook > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* Axil Axil <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Monday, May 7, 2018 10:06:45 AM > *To:* vortex-l > *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > > Polaritons always form on the surface of metal. When there is enough of > them, they naturally begin to come together into a structure that looks > like a petal. When a critical density is reached, they form a condensate. > > > > This Polariton Bose condensate can store energy. How does this condensate > do this? The polariton condensate that does this power storage is called a > petal condensate. > > > > Coupled counter-rotating polariton condensates in optically defined > annular potentials > > http://www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8770 > > > > Stable Switching among High-Order Modes in Polariton Condensates > > https://arxiv.org/pdf/1602.03024 > > > > [image: F1.large.jpg] > <https://www.lenr-forum.com/image-proxy/?key=1d8bcaa5c7bf279028d38434b4815126c43edf443e73d739ecebc6b73d13f8ac-aHR0cDovL3d3dy5wbmFzLm9yZy9jb250ZW50L3BuYXMvMTExLzI0Lzg3NzAvRjEubGFyZ2UuanBn> > > > > As power is pumped into the petal condensate the number of petals > increases, the frequency of the light that the petals are comprised of > increases from red to blue to XUV and then to X-ray. The diameter of the > condensate also increases from nano-meters, to millimeters and then to > centimeters. At high energy storage levels, the Petal condensate becomes > visible to the naked eye. The petal condensate can move around. > > > > The petal condensate is comprised of two counterattacking rings of > polaritons. As the energy is pumped into this condensate, the energy is > also stored as increasing annular momentum of the rotating rings. The petal > condensate just contains the spins of electrons and photons. The charge and > orbits stay in the electric dipole part of the polariton. > > > > The electric dipole that the petal condensate is entangled with also > increases in size. > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_dipole_moment > > > > [image: VFPt_dipole_animation_electric.gif] > > The diameter of the dipole increases into the millimeters. > > > > The energy storage potential of a petal condensate can get as high as a > few GeV. > > > > In the LION reactor meltdown as well as many other LENR experiments, > strange radiation is seen. These particle tracks are produced by the energy > rich petal condensate as it moves around and absorbs energy using self > pumping along it path of travel. > > > > The basic driver of the LENR reaction is chiral spin polarization. There > are a number of structures that naturally form in nature that produce this > type of polarization. The petal condensate is one of them. The petal > condensate is make up of two counter rotating currents of spin. The two > counter rotating rings of spin are composed of a right handed spin current > and left handed spin current. > > > > > > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 7:04 AM, Roarty, Francis X < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Axil, Your paragraph snipped below makes me question a relationship to > Casimir effect, does your scenario exist even when the pumping of the > cavity is just virtual particles? Is that enough to form a BEC and a basis > for Casimir effect rejecting longer virtual particles in the cavity… the > effect only occurs in conductive plates so the electron cloud and potential > for polaritons is present. I’m wondering if “nonequilibrium driven > disapative systems” is related to the vacuum density in these cavities. I > assume it applies to both Rossi and Mills geometries but you are > concentrating on the conversion and shielding aspect…. What synergy do you > predict between this shielding/conversion aspect and the actual source of > the gamma? Does your theory require gas atoms in the cavity or are you > saying that just energy alone pumped into the cavity will suffice? > > Fran > > Axil said[snip][This kind of BEC is a Condensate that forms in > nonequilibrium driven-dissipative systems. The polariton needs to be pumped > with energy because it loses energy from the cavity that contains it. If > more energy feeds the polaritons than leaks out of the cavity in which the > polariton forms, it can live and grow in power. The amount of nuclear > energy that the polariton BEC can thermalize is a function of the power > that is feed into the Polariton BEC and the amount of power that the > Polariton BEC loses over a given time(AKA the Q factor).[/snip] > > > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Saturday, May 05, 2018 3:22 PM > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > > hacking radiation > > > > should read > > > > Hawking radiation > > > > On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 2:44 PM, Axil Axil <[email protected]> wrote: > > The polariton BEC acts as a analog black hole. It thermalizes gamma via > hacking radiation which is a thermal level emmision. The heat produced by > hacking radiation is recovered as energy from the vacuum since the anti > photon falls back into the BEC. This BEC also produces light whose > frequency is a function of the density of the polariton condensate. It has > been said that Rossi's QX reactor produces light from red to blue based on > its power level. > > > > The final emission type is muon production. > > > > for more info, see > > > > https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00822148/file/Flayac-2012CLF22262.pdf > > > > 2.4 Sonic black holes and wormholes in spinor polariton condensates (page > 116) > > > > On Sat, May 5, 2018 at 11:53 AM, Roarty, Francis X < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Axil, would your scenario support effects on gas atoms between these > surfaces and Casimir/London forces? I like that it explains thermalizing > the gamma. > > > > Fran > > > > *From:* Axil Axil [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Friday, May 04, 2018 11:42 PM > *To:* vortex-l <[email protected]> > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Gamma radiation from LENR > > > > Sometimes radiation is produced by the LENR reaction. Why does this occur? > > > > It is my belief that the LENR process that thermalizes nuclear level > radiation is Bose Einstein Condensation (BEC). If a condition of BEC > circumscribes the LENR reaction, the BEC will absorb that nuclear level > radiation and downshift it into the thermal frequency range. > > > > But for a BEC to be created, doesn’t the temperature need to be at super > low temperatures near absolute zero? > > > > There are two kinds of BEC. The BEC that requires super low temperatures > involves atoms. The other kind of BEC is the polariton BEC. > > > > See for background see: > > > > https://warwick.ac.uk/fac/sci/physics/staff/academic/szymanska/research/ > polaritonbec/ > > > > This kind of BEC is a Condensate that forms in nonequilibrium > driven-dissipative systems. The polariton needs to be pumped with energy > because it loses energy from the cavity that contains it. If more energy > feeds the polaritons than leaks out of the cavity in which the polariton > forms, it can live and grow in power. The amount of nuclear energy that the > polariton BEC can thermalize is a function of the power that is feed into > the Polariton BEC and the amount of power that the Polariton BEC loses over > a given time(AKA the Q factor). > > > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Q_factor > > > > What affects the Q factor of a polariton substrate? > > > > Polaritons are a form of light…actually a mixture of matter and light. > > > > Polaritons cannot exist unless they form on a substrate of a metal. The Q > factor is a character of the substrate; it is a function of how the > substrate lets light escape the surface of the metal. A rough and pitted > metal surface will produce a higher Q factor than a shiny smooth mirror > like metal surface because a rough metal surface reflects light less well > than a shining mirror like metal surface. In general, this Q factor of > surfaces applies to any type of wave based EMF including electrons. > Superconducting surfaces support the highest Q factor. Very little power > loss occurs from the surface of a superconductor. A polariton condensate > will retain it power for months when the polaritons are supported on the > surface of a superconductor. > > > > A collection of polaritons will form a Condensate when their density > reaches a critical value based on the quantum gas theory. The formation of > a polariton condensate has nothing to fo with temperature. > > > > https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.016602 > > > > This theory of polariton condensation boils down to these LENR design rule > associated with eliminating gamma radiation from the LENR reaction. > > > > For a non-fueled reactor. > > > > If you are using the surface of a metal to produce your polaritons, then > roughen up that surface to make it dull and pitted. This is what Mizuno > does to his metal surfaces. Mizumo processes his metal surfaces with an > electric arc until that surface is well pitted. > > > > You can increase the input power pumping of energy onto the surface of the > metal so that the extra power increases the number of polaritons produced > by the metal surface thereby causing a polariton condensate to form. > > When Rossi had gamma radiation problems, he added a heater to his reactor > to make sure he stated up a HOT reactor. The thermal pumping to the micro > particles was increased by the heater so that on startup, the Rossi E-Cat > did not produce gamma from a cold reactor. > > > > If metal particles are used instead of a metal surface (as per Piantelli), > use a mix of very wide range of various particles sizes from micro to nano > sizes. > > > > For a fueled reactor. > > > > A fueled reactor uses a hydride fuel that contains ultra-dense > hydrogen(UDH) or ultra-dense lithium to support the LENR reaction. UDH is a > superconductor and the hydride fuel that supports it will support the LNER > reaction at any temperature and/or polariton pumping level due to the > extremely high Q of the surface of the UDH superconductor. > > > > The production of positrons in a LENR reactor. > > Without a polariton BEC to thermalize gamma radiation, the LENR reaction > will produce gamma as a result of positron production. > > The LENR reaction is a weak force reaction. When the LENR reaction adds > mass to the protons and neutrons, they will become excited and decay when > the LENR reaction adds energy/mass to the quarks inside these nucleons. > > As a decay process of these nucleons, both positive and negative muons are > produced as a decay product. The positive muons come from the decay of > anti-quarks in the nucleons. > > The decay of the positive muon will produce positrons as a decay product. > > > > > > > > > > > > >
