There's a naivety if you think they've spent billions and not considered circumstances like this with great detail.
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 2:16 AM, Alain Sepeda <[email protected]> wrote: > There is a naivety in many automatic cars, that the old bike driver (vehicular > cycling schoo <http://www.bicyclinglife.com/PracticalCycling/VCIntro.htm>l > I am quickly lost. > This is the second time (previous was Google car facing an non > collaborating bus), an automatic car assume collaboration and empathy from > a professional driver. > > A study from franche transportation labs (INRETS) studied acciodents and > found huge majority involve both vehicles, even the one assumed to be > innocent. usual case is one violating by abuse or mistake a rule, and the > other seeing and refusing the hijack causing the accident. > > I suspect with automatic vehicle, the problem is too much theory. > > 2017-11-09 3:20 GMT+01:00 H LV <[email protected]>: > >> https://www.theverge.com/2017/11/8/16626224/las-vegas-self-d >> riving-shuttle-crash-accident-first-day >> >> >> While it was technically the fault of the truck driver and not the fault >> of the self-driving shuttle, if the self driving shuttle had been >> programmed to allow it to back up the collision could have been prevented. >> >> Harry >> > >
