Further on the below... (Assuming its reality): could a future well-designed and crafted, theoretically definitively-understood nano-scale nano-tek cold fusion machine be designed, so that the 'ash' by-product would be forced out of the arena of the 'reaction chambers' as part of the process of energy release..? That way IMO you could be keeping at least part of the entire process 'clean' of by-product build-up... and ready for the next batch of fuel 'input'. As far as I understand any of this.
And whether that fuel and/or the reaction matrix itself must be continuously delivered to the reaction site dynamically, by some nano-tek means. On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 4:49 PM, Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 2:45 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < > bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: > >> Che— >> >> >> >> You nailed my thought process. >> >> >> >> Look at the dots: and make logical connections with PRACTICAL scheme for >> testing. This is IMHO the crux of R&D. >> >> >> >> Bob Cook >> > > > AFAIC the key to 'success' -- scientific or monetary -- is to indeed > 'KISS' (Keep It Simple, Stupid!), _first_. > > Without a 'killer app' device for ALL to get their hands on -- most likely > some drop-dead-simple hot-steam generator, churning out Utility-free energy > on-demand, in any location, for pennies -- what self-interested > 'enterprise' would want to plow oodles of cash down a bottomless money-pit, > on some vague expectation of 'profit' in some not-too-imminent haze-ridden > future..? Most of them would probably rather put their money on the > 'Underwear Gnomes' instead. > > So maybe this ECCO is Open Science's answer to the self-interested > proprietary shithead types like Rossi -- and whatever these 'geniuses' have > hidden up their sleeves at the moment. > > I really hope cavitation is the key to cheap, abundant cold fusion devices. > > > > > > *From: *Che <comandantegri...@gmail.com> >> *Sent: *Saturday, July 22, 2017 9:38 PM >> *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com >> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just >> uploaded a video >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 2:57 PM, bobcook39...@hotmail.com < >> bobcook39...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >> TWO ideas about noble gases and fuel preparation: >> >> >> >> 1. Being inert, they can be used in combination with H or D to >> diffuse into a metallic lattice and cause mico-cracking with creation >> of >> LENR active sites with large internal surface areas for formation of >> SSP’s. >> 2. Repeated cycling, gassing and degassing, would allow measurement >> of increased number of mico-cavities until a desired density is >> established. Careful measurement of the volume of gas that diffuses in >> and out with each cycle would be instructive in this regard. A mass >> spectrometer to determine ratios of the diffusing gases and knowledge of >> their diffusion rates in the fuel should provide additional information >> regarding the status of micro-cavity density in the fuel. >> >> >> >> A nano-particle fracture mechanics analysis may be warranted to determine >> desirable pressure and temperatures during cycling/fuel preparation. >> Brittle-ductile transition temperature of the metallic fuel lattice would >> help determine appropriate lower temperatures for cycling, since brittle >> fractures with 1 or 2 dimensional characteristics may be a desirable LENR >> geometry for SSP’s. Acoustic emission monitoring of the fuel cycling >> would aid in determination of fracturing occurring during cycling at >> various temperatures, pressures and noble gases being used. (Cavities that >> are too big may be bad for LENR+. >> >> >> >> Bob Cook >> >> First it starts with the by-chance, haphazard nano-fracking. >> >> Then follows the sophisticated, calculated, systematic nano-tek >> build-system... >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >
