The report was credible enough for IH not to move forward on their case. I'm glad to see you got a start on delineating all the scientific charlatanism in that report and in the case.
On 7/10/17, Jed Rothwell <jedrothw...@gmail.com> wrote: > Kevin O'Malley <kevmol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > You're probably right. But there is evidence he had a COP > 1 for >> some length of time according to the report by the person chosen by >> both sides to administer the test. >> > > You mean the report that claims the laboratory was in a perfect vacuum, and > the flow was EXACTLY the same, to the nearest 1,000 liters, for days on > end. > > The report lacks credibility, to say the very least. > > - Jed >
