from recent data, taking any conclusion on Rossi's claims is at best risky, and to be honest, baseless.
2017-07-07 3:01 GMT+02:00 Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>: > What the Rossi experiments has shown over many years is that LENR in a > lattice is not workable because the reaction cannot be controlled. This > lack of control makes the E-Cat technology untenable. Rossi has > realized this and Rossi is will to let this knowhow fadeaway. The LENR > reaction wants to operate at the boiling point of the metal lattice > (nickel) which is 3000K. LENR is based on activation of nanoparticles in a > dusty plasma. Rossi has struggled to control the LENR reaction at low > temperatures but he always fails because LENR would invariably get to 3000K > and meltdown his reactor. So Rossi finally decided to use reactor > structural material that doesn't melt at 3000K. This material must be an > insulator that does not melt at 3000K. Mills has stumbled on the same > reaction and his SunCell runs at the vapor point of silver at only 2200C. > Mills has solved the meltdown problem is another way, he justs runs > everything as a liquid without any containment. Holmlid is on to the same > LENR mechanism. There is nothing unusual with metalized hydrogen. In the > LENR reaction, metalized hydrogen acts like any > other metallic nanoparticle. > > > Using a lattice for LENR is a losing proposition. The dusty plasma > approach to the LENR reaction is the only way to go. I beleive that Rossi > has settled on a high temperature tube material that works: boron nitride, > a transparent isolator whose melting point is 3000C. > > > Alan Smith wrote: > <https://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/thread/4645-rossi-blog-comment-discussion/?postID=62235#post62235> > > *I do remember. BTW, eye witness accounts claim that the tube itself is > transparent, and the electrodes bright silver colour. nothing is visible in > the gap. I have no idea about sealing or anything else - except that the > plasma can apparently be made 'any colour you like'. The example shown was > glowing **yellow** when energised for short periods. That's all the info > I have.* > > > Unlike most other observers of Rossi, I know that the QuarkX works because > its reported behavior fits in with my understanding of how LENR works. > > > For example: > > > New research into polariton condensates has revealed a side emission > channel that produces light whose frequency is proportional to the density > of the polariton aggregation...for example, the dense polariton condinsate > produces a higher frequency light (blue) and a less dense condinsate will > produce red light. Rossi must have a way to control the density of the > polariton population. > > > See > > > https://phys.org/news/2016-06-…einstein-condensates.html > <https://phys.org/news/2016-06-superconductors-lasers-bose-einstein-condensates.html> > > > They tackled this problem by highly exciting exciton-polaritons, which are > particle-like excitations in a semiconductor systems and formed by strong > coupling between electron-hole pairs and photons. *They observed > high-energy side-peak emission *that cannot be explained by two > mechanisms known to date: Bose-Einstein condensation of exciton-polaritons, > nor conventional semiconductor lasing driven by the optical gain from > unbound electron hole plasma. > > > > The details on this side channel are here > > > https://www.nature.com/articles/srep25655 > High-energy side-peak emission of exciton-polariton condensates in high > density regime > > In summary, eyewitness reports of QuarkX operating characteristics fit my > technical expectations perfectly in very many ways. > > > > > On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > >> According to Abd... "All claims dropped on both sides. It is as if the >> suit was never filed. All parties bear their own costs. The action of the >> Agreement was the consent of counsel to settlement without any court order >> other than dismissal, which is final." >> >> No agreements were included... so unless they present something otherwise >> in a joint statement, IH retains the original E-Cat License. No money >> changes hands. >> >> As for the future of the litigants, it looks like IH paid about $11 >> million ++ for a License which according to them is worthless insofar as it >> was never shown to produce excess heat. Add to that the attorney fees and >> we see why many observers consider IH to be the big loser in this. >> >> That assumes the IP is really worthless, but it may have value in a >> surprising way, even if Rossi could never make it work. Here is the granted >> patent, and there are a number of applications not granted. >> >> https://www.google.com/patents/US9115913 >> >> Darden raised much more than his losses on the Rossi fiasco and there is >> a small chance that he could make lemonade out of the Rossi lemons, using >> some of it. An interesting development in all of this will be the course >> that IH takes from here on with the remaining money. They are known to have >> been funding others in LENR all along. >> >> Of course IH could abandon the field altogether, but maybe they have a >> vision which transcends Rossigate. Possibly the best thing that could >> happen is for Randell Mills to demonstrate strong gain in that SunCell >> device. If it turns out that Mills device is arguably nuclear - it will not >> be covered by the hydrino IP. There have already been "inside" rumors that >> recent delays in the "Mills' Roadshow" are due to radioactivity showing up. >> This is expected in LENR but not in hydrino-tech and it could change the IP >> landscape. >> >> Footnote. Rossi's IP covers "Group 10 catalysts" which are nickel, >> palladium and platinum. It does not cover silver, which is being used by >> Mills and is Group 11. Silver is easily activated and perhaps it is >> activated by dense hydrogen. Mills' IP would not cover nuclear reactions. >> This puts him in a bind. If silver is required, but becomes activated, then >> there is an IP storm brewing. >> >> If I were advising Darden, it would be to look at quickly expanding the >> IP to fill the gap which exists when Mills can no longer hide the >> radioactivity of the SunCell. >> >> >> >
