On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 10:08 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote:
But ... the big issue is this: can an ill-conceived contract be interpreted > by a jury to overlook the actual results (to imply that only the ERV's > conclusion matters, not the substance of the report) ? > > The World runs the way it does, precisely _because_ 'the letter of the law' (here, contract law) trumps ALL other considerations. Even life & death. (The only real caveat to this 'iron law' being: who wields _more_ power, on which side of any contract..?)
