I believe the Monday test is just being setup. Apparently Me356 has setup a freshly prepared reactor for today's test.
MFMP is using 2 different high-end power analyzers for measurement of the input power. To Me356's credit, he has worked hard to accommodate the continued testing even though the first two days of testing yielded null results. Let's see what happens. On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 8:14 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks like a major problem has been spotted, suggesting why me356 honestly > thought he was getting excess heat: > > His power meter was reading 0.452 KW > > vs > > 1.112 KW from MFMP meter > > Yikes... such a significant deficit error in measuring input power will > certainly give the appearance of OU. The inventor most likely believed he > was getting gain - or he would never have scheduled the testing. > > This conclusion assumes the MFMP meter is accurate. The error does not > explain COP=6 and there is still the chance of seeing lesser gain. > > > <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> Virus-free. www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/email-signature?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail> <#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
