There is a difference between a monopole fundamental particle, a monopole quasiparticle like the SPP, and a magnetic field formatted to support monopole flux lines.
The SmCo5 magnet produces a magnetic field that is anisotropic field (almost a monopole formated magnetic field). This SmCo5 type magnetic supports monopole flux lines of force. That is why the SmCo5 magnet can produce a LENR reaction. To refresh your memory, see http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg108069.html On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 6:36 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > Axil, > I am not able to judge the properties of many of these smaller particles. > They seem to be more a matter of the individual's belief than pinned down > by experiment. Let me know when someone *proves* the existence of a > magnetic monopole. > > AA > > > On 4/1/2017 3:39 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > Rossi et al are confusing cause and effect. The strong and the weak force > produce nuclear change and the subatomic particles are the effects of how > those forces function. The strong and the weak force produce the pion, > muons, and mesons that Rossi is now factoring into his theory. But these > particles are just the effects of what the strong force is doing in LENR. > LENR is a condition where the strong force changes the way it behaves. The > particles are the results of this change in behavior. > > Professional science states the the fundamental forces of nature cannot > change unless they are affected by the application of extremes in energy. > If enough energy is present, then the fundamental forces will gradually > become unified. This is the main tenet in supersymmetry. > > But as witnessed by LENR, the fundamental forces do not behave in this > way. As Rossi states, these forces change when a special type of magnetism > is applied to the fundamental forces of nature. Rossi has picked the > quadrupole magnetic force as the factor that changes the action of the > fundamental forces. This pick is wrong. But informed by other LENR > experimentation, we know that the proper LENR active magnetic force format > is the monopole magnetic force. > > But we must give him his due, Rossi is very close to having LENR theory > correct in its most basic aspects. > > On Sat, Apr 1, 2017 at 3:13 PM, Daniel Rocha <danieldi...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> I am not being snarky. I am just stating something evident. And you seem >> to forget that I side with Rossi and I think all is wrong with IH >> "evidences". >> >> 2017-04-01 13:51 GMT-03:00 a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net>: >> >>> Why be so snarky? You have no clue when Rossi learnt that. Jumping to >>> conclusions on such flimsy evidence does nothing for your credibility. >>> >>> AA >>> >>> On 3/31/2017 6:10 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: >>> >>> Not really a big deal. That's a merely cursory knowledge of particle >>> physics. He probably learned about this when writing his last paper. >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Daniel Rocha - RJ >> danieldi...@gmail.com >> > > >
