I have not been following the lawsuit, and I have lost track of who is suing who for what. But anyway, aficionados who follow it say there is damning information in some new documents. All the documents are here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BzKtdce19-wyb1RxOTF6c2NtZkk See document 118 and 118-01 exhibit A and 118-02 exhibit B. If I understand correctly, these show the company was operating with a few hundred dollars a month which was being paid by Rossi. Also, Rossi instructed his lawyer to say the company has a connection to Johnson Matthey. One document seems to show that Bass has no idea what the company does, and he seldom shows up to work. This was uploaded by I.H. They described the exhibits as follows, on p. 3 of document 118: "Third Party Defendants James Bass (“Bass) and Henry Johnson (“Johnson”) have produced some documents, but the total is only 842 pages. Even though this is not a sizable production, the documents in the production have already clearly established important allegations in this case to the benefit of Defendants, including among other things that (a) Third Party Defendant J.M. Products (“JMP”) was not a “real Customer” (to use Rossi’s phrase) using power from Plaintiffs in a manufacturing process, (b) JMP was not associated with the well-known British company of Johnson Matthey, and (c) Rossi was in control of JMP and paying for all JMP’s expenses, but in a manner to conceal this from others, including Defendants. See Composite Exhibit A; see also Third Amended Answer, Additional Defenses, Counterclaims and Third Party Claims (“AACT”) ¶¶69-79 [D.E. 78]." I don't understand this stuff, so don't ask me. I am just reporting it here. - Jed
