The Higgs field produces mass in sub light speed particles. Photons do not have mass...gravitational mass. But when inside a Bose condinsate, Photons get mass and go slower than the speed of light.
Mass...massless...light speed...sub light speed...all involve superconductivity. The same is true for the Weyl fermion...it is produced by superconductivity. On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Bob Higgins <[email protected]> wrote: > Jones, can you supply a reference or references that show that the Shawer > drive doesn't work with silver and stainless steel as you state below? > > Also, according to Hotson, an epo is massless because of the spinor nature > of the degenerate orbits shared between the electron and its positron > phase-twin. Positronium is an orbiting electron and positron that are in > normal orbits (above degenerate, have not given off the dual 511 keV > photons). Positronium has a mass of essentially twice that of the > electron. There are no free electrons in the negative Dirac sea - only > epos. So a free electron always has mass. > > Also, in this Weyl fermion discussion of electrons not having mass, is the > description that it has no apparent inertial mass? No gravitational mass? > Making gravitational mass dissapear would be a neat trick. How can > inertial mass disappear without gravitational mass also disappearing? Or > are we just talking about a balance of forces? > > > On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Jones Beene <[email protected]> wrote: > >> There is a complex web of cross-connections between HTSC (high >> temperature superconductivity), Weyl fermions, an active aether, >> copper-oxides, and the RF resonant cavity thruster of Shawyer et al (the >> EM drive). The cross-connections are ill-defined at present and could be >> coincidental, but we can take notice of the various links and use that >> information to steer research. >> >> This is especially interesting if we can define an “aether” in such a way >> that it cannot be discredited. One way is via the theory of Don Hotson. The >> epo or BEC is based on Dirac’s equation and theories – as is all of >> Hotson’s “interpretation of Dirac” and this aether-like field consists >> entirely of massless electrons, possibly now defined as Weyl fermions, in the >> context of massless positronium. >> >> It makes sense to suggest that the Weyl fermion, which has been recently >> confirmed >> as real, is indeed an outlier of the same aether-species of Hotson. Since >> the BEC (as aether) is fully contained throughout another more basic >> spatial dimension or foundation (which can be “reciprocal space” or 1D) >> it would not be unexpected to find some of these massless electrons >> escaping into our 3-Space, and apparently they are coaxed out of the >> aether dimension via various “semimetals” which are also superconductive >> oxides. Wheeler’s “quantum foam” may be additional evidence of >> bleed-over from an epo field into 3-space. >> >> The Meissner effect is usually explained as the expulsion of magnetic >> flux by a superconductor in a magnetic field, but that may be a partial >> understanding. The phenomenon would be explained differently if we focus >> on an aether composed of Weyl fermions as Dirac’s sea. This would >> indicate that Meissner repulsion can become (at least partly) a >> Coulomb’s Law effect - instead of only inductive. Probably it is a bit >> of both and possibly this combined effect relates to the tiny thrust of >> the EM drive, where the cavity asymmetry creates a “wake” of virtual Weyl >> fermions. >> >> A final piece of the puzzle seems to be that only copper works for the >> frustum of the EM drive, which would naturally have a copper oxide >> coating. Silver and stainless steel have been tried and don’t work. Copper >> oxides can become superconductive at high temperature, most often when >> compounded with other elements. However, there is evidence of that a >> thin copper oxide coating would have some properties of HTSC on a >> transitory basis. >> >> An interesting detail is the implication that CuO could be a Weyl >> semimetal and transient HTSC. CuO possibly only works in a very thin >> layer which explains why some cavities work better than others. >> >> It would be most intriguing if transient HTSC can be further linked to >> the Weyl fermion and to copper oxide and to reactionless thrust. Don >> Hotson may have posthumously shown us the way. >> >> >
